Cited by 25Atmospheric Ozone and ClimateAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols

Long-Term Variability of UV Irradiance in the Moscow Region according to Measurement and Modeling Data

Chubarova, N. E., Pastukhova, A. S., Galin, V. Ya., Smyshlyaev, S. P.·2018·Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics

Abstract

We have found distinct long-period changes in erythemal UV radiation ( Q er ) characterized by a pronounced decrease at the end of the 1970s and a statistically significant positive trend of more than 5%/10 years since 1979 over the territory of the Moscow region according to the measurements and reconstruction model. The positive Q er trend is shown to be associated mainly with a decrease in the effective cloud amount and total ozone content (TOC). Due to these variations, UV resources have significantly changed in spring for the population with the most vulnerable skin type I, which means a transition from the UV optimum to UV moderate excess conditions. The simulation experiments using the INM-RSHU chemistry climate model (CCM) for several scenarios with and without anthropogenic factors have revealed that the variations in the anthropogenic emissions of halogens have the most significant impact on the variability of TOC and Q er . Among natural factors, noticeable effects are observed due to volcanic aerosol. The calculations of the cloud transmittance of Q er are generally consistent with the measurements; however, they do not reproduce the observed value of the positive trend.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1134/s0001433818020056

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trend estimates of ultraviolet irradiance showed no significant difference during study periods.

    “The authors substantiated this by reporting that trend estimates of ultraviolet irradiance showed no significant difference during study periods”

    From Skin protection from solar ultraviolet radiation using natural compounds: a review (2024) · cites this paper as Chubarova et al. 2018

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chubarova, N. E., Pastukhova, A. S., Galin, V. Y., & Smyshlyaev, S. P.
Affiliations
  • Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU)
  • Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
  • Russian State Hydrometeorological University (RU)
Corresponding author
Chubarova, N. E.
Venue
Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics
Published
2018-03
Volume
54
Issue
2
Pages
139-146
ISSN
  • 0001-4338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-628X
OpenAlex
W2803092527
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Izvestiya Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics (publishedVersion)
Funders
Russian Foundation for Basic Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Keywords
total ozone, halogen emissions, volcanic aerosols, chemistry-climate model, skin cancer risk, cloud transmittance, Moscow region

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review