The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The production of exopolysaccharide by Pseudomonas putida GAP-P45 under various abiotic stress conditions and its role in soil aggregation
Abstract
Exopolysaccharides (EPS) production is modified in response to environmental changes and is believed to protect bacteria. In the present study Pseudomonas putida strain GAP-P45 identified by 16S rDNA sequence analysis was exposed to stresses such as drought, temperature and salt to test the ability to tolerate and produce EPS. Strain GAP-P45 could tolerate matric stress up to −0.73 MPa, Temperature of 50°C and 1.4 M salt and produced EPS, which increased with increase in stress levels. Among all stress conditions, the production was high under drought stress. HPLC analysis revealed that monosaccharide composition and ratio of sugars in EPS increased under stress that might induce osmotic and thermal tolerance in GAP-P45. Rhamnose was reported as major sugar under all stress conditions. Among the different carbon sources tested, glycerol was found to be best for EPS production under stressed as well as non-stressed conditions. Inoculation with GAP-P45 resulted in better soil aggregation and aggregate stability under different stress conditions. However inoculation effect was more under drought-stress. The significance of these findings shows that abiotic stresses influence the EPS composition and ratios of sugars, which influence the tolerance of the microorganisms which can be employed for improvement in water holding capacity under unfavorable environmental conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Burton, K. (1956) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj0620315 · Cited by 14,090
New method for quantitative determination of uronic acids
Blumenkrantz, N., & Asboe-Hansen, G. (1973) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(73)90377-1 · Cited by 7,140
Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils
TISDALL, J. M., & OADES, J. M. (1982) · Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1982.tb01755.x · Cited by 6,267
Cited by
Kumar Arora, N., Fatima, T., Mishra, J., Mishra, I., Verma, S., Verma, R., Verma, M., Bhattacharya, A., Verma, P., Mishra, P., et al. (2020) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2020.07.003 · Cited by 312
Vandana, & Das, S. (2022) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119536 · Cited by 199
Metadata
- Authors
- Sandhya, V., & Ali, S. Z.
- Venue
- Microbiology
- Publisher
- Pleiades Publishing Ltd
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 512-519
- ISSN
- 0026-2617 (ISSN-L)
- 1608-3237
- OpenAlex
- W2253235253
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The production of exopolysaccharide by Pseudomonas putida GAP-P45 under various abiotic stress conditions and its role in soil aggregation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1134/s0026261715040153
- The paper
- Sandhya, V., & Ali, S. Z. (2015). The production of exopolysaccharide by Pseudomonas putida GAP-P45 under various abiotic stress conditions and its role in soil aggregation. Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0026261715040153
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.