Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 312

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 120 of the 120 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Halo-tolerant plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for improving productivity and remediation of saline soils

Open access
Kumar Arora, Naveen, Fatima, Tahmish, Mishra, Jitendra, Mishra, Isha, Verma, Sushma, Verma, Renu, Verma, Maya, Bhattacharya, Ankita, Verma, Priyanka, Mishra, Priya, Bharti, Chanda·2020·Journal of Advanced Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The collective impact of climate change and soil salinity is continuously increasing the degraded lands across the globe, bringing agricultural productivity and food security under stress. The high concentration of salts in saline soils impose osmotic, ionic, oxidative and water stress in plants. Biological solutions can be the most reliable and sustainable approach to ensure food security and limit the use of agro-chemicals. AIM OF REVIEW: Halo-tolerant plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (HT-PGPR) are emerging as efficient biological tools to mitigate the toxic effects of high salt concentrations and improve the growth of plants, simultaneously remediating the degraded saline soils. The review explains the role of HT-PGPR in mitigating the salinity stress in plants through diverse mechanisms and concurrently leading to improvement of soil quality. KEY SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS OF REVIEW: kinetics and improving the levels of phytohormones and nutrient uptake in plants. The modification of signaling by HT-PGPR inoculation under stress conditions elicits induced systemic resistance in plants which further prepares them against salinity stress. The role of microbial-mechanisms in remediating the saline soil through structural and compositional improvements is also important. Development of novel bioinoculants for saline soils based on the concepts presented in the review can be a sustainable approach in improving productivity of affected agro-ecosystems and simultaneously remediating them.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jare.2020.07.003

Cites

120 of 120 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 120 references

Metadata

Authors
Kumar Arora, N., Fatima, T., Mishra, J., Mishra, I., Verma, S., Verma, R., Verma, M., Bhattacharya, A., Verma, P., Mishra, P., & Bharti, C.
Venue
Journal of Advanced Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
26
Pages
69-82
ISSN
  • 2090-1224 (ISSN-L)
  • 2090-1232
OpenAlex
W3040820289
Cited by
312
References
120
FWCI
18.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Halo-tolerant plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for improving productivity and remediation of saline soils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jare.2020.07.003
The paper
Kumar Arora, N., Fatima, T., Mishra, J., Mishra, I., Verma, S., Verma, R., Verma, M., Bhattacharya, A., Verma, P., Mishra, P., & Bharti, C. (2020). Halo-tolerant plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for improving productivity and remediation of saline soils. Journal of Advanced Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2020.07.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.