Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A search for a “Genghis Khan” chromosome

Zakharov, I. A.·2010·Russian Journal of Genetics

Abstract

Zerial et al. (2003) have shown that a special variant of the Y chromosome, characterized by a set of microsatellite markers occurs at high frequency in the number of human populations of Central Asia. This variant was attributed to the descendants of Genghis Khan and its accumulation, to social selection. A search of this Y chromosome variant in Russian populations was conducted. The "Genghis Khan Y chromosome" has been found among Altaians, Altai Kazakhs, Buryats, Kalmyks, Nogaits, and Tuvinians. Its highest frequency (13.8%) was observed in Nogaits. In the examined cases the carriers of the "Genghis Khan Y chromosome" possessed no information on their origin.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1134/s1022795410090310

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 2

Metadata

Authors
Zakharov, I. A.
Venue
Russian Journal of Genetics
Published
2010-09
Volume
46
Issue
9
Pages
1130-1131
ISSN
  • 1022-7954
  • 1608-3369
Cited by
1
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review