Cited by 45Neonatal and fetal brain pathologyMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsNeonatal Respiratory Health Research

Effect of delayed sampling on umbilical cord arterial and venous lactate and blood gases in clamped and unclamped vessels

Open access
Armstrong, L, Stenson, B·2006·Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition

Abstract

Background: Cord blood lactate at birth is a marker of antenatal hypoxia, and is comparable to pH as a prognostic tool. Objective: To determine, by a prospective observational study, the effect of delayed sampling from arteries and veins that were double clamped to isolate the blood from the placenta (clamped), and from vessels that were not isolated from the placenta (unclamped). Methods: Paired samples taken from clamped and unclamped vessels at 0, 20, 40, and 60 minutes were analysed for lactate, base excess, pH, and P co 2. Data were analysed as the change from time 0 at 20, 40, and 60 minutes. Results: Thirty eight placentas of infants delivered by elective caesarean section were studied. Arterial samples were taken from 20 placentas, and venous samples from 18 placentas. Arterial and venous lactate was significantly higher than at time 0 by 20 minutes in both clamped and unclamped vessels. Changes in unclamped vessels were greater than in clamped vessels. The pH remained unchanged over 60 minutes in clamped vessels, but changed significantly in unclamped vessels. Base excess changed significantly in both clamped and unclamped vessels. Conclusions: Cord blood samples taken after 20 minutes delay are unreliable for lactate measurement, even if the vessel has been doubly clamped to isolate the blood from the placenta. Current guidelines that state that blood can be sampled from a clamped cord for up to one hour after delivery should not apply to the interpretation of lactate or base excess. Delayed sampling from unclamped cords is very unreliable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/adc.2005.086744

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In double-clamped cords, the arterial lactate concentration increases linearly with time, and a 10-minute delay of analysis will result in an approximately 0.6 mmol/L higher value, irrespective of mode of delivery and initial value.

    “In double-clamped cords, the arterial lactate concentration increases linearly with time, and a 10-minute delay of analysis will result in an approximately 0.6 mmol/L higher value, irrespective of mode of delivery and initial value.69,71”

    From Umbilical cord pH, blood gases, and lactate at birth: normal values, interpretation, and clinical utility. (2023) · cites this paper as [69]

    Table 2 reports a mean arterial lactate increase of 1.2 mmol/L after 20 minutes in double-clamped cords, consistent with an approximate rate of 0.6 mmol/L per 10 minutes; the discussion describes the change as linear. But the study measured delayed sampling at 20-minute intervals, not a 10-minute delay in analysis. Its participants delivered by elective caesarean section and were metabolically normal at birth, so it does not establish the result irrespective of delivery mode or initial value. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. ACOG technical bulletin. Umbilical artery blood acid-base analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1996;52:305-10.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Armstrong, L., & Stenson, B.
Affiliations
Edinburgh Royal Infirmary (GB)
Corresponding author
Armstrong, L
Venue
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2006-04-25
Volume
91
Issue
5
Pages
F342-F345
ISSN
  • 1359-2998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2052
OpenAlex
W2168655168
Cited by
45
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
Keywords
umbilical cord clamping, antenatal hypoxia, base excess, blood pH, umbilical artery, umbilical vein, placental blood, cordocentesis, cesarean section
MeSH terms
Acid-Base Equilibrium, Blood Specimen Collection, Carbon Dioxide, Constriction, Fetal Hypoxia, Fetal Blood, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Infant, Newborn, Partial Pressure, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Umbilical Arteries, Umbilical Veins, Lactic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review