Cited by 45Connective tissue disorders researchChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentInfant Development and Preterm Care

Joint mobility and motor development.

Open access
Jaffe, M, Tirosh, E, Cohen, A, Taub, Y·1988·Archives of Disease in Childhood

Abstract

The association of joint hypermobility and motor development was sequentially investigated in 715 infants from the ages of 8 to 14 months. Seven joints were evaluated for mobility, and each infant underwent a physical and neurological examination. Parents were given a Denver Developmental Parents' Questionnaire. All subjects with a general developmental delay, systemic illness or syndrome were excluded. The infants were classified as having normal or delayed motor development with normal or delayed joint mobility. They were re-examined six months later. Multivariate statistical techniques was used for categorical analysis, and three joints were found to be significantly associated with motor delay at the first examination--hip abduction, elbow hyperextension, and foot dorsiflexion. Of the 715 infants, 126 had joint hypermobility and of these 38 (30.2%) had motor delay. Sixty four of 589 (10.9%) with normal joints had delayed motor development. Six months later 23 out of 35 of the group with joint hypermobility and 42 out of 53 of the group with normal joints had normal motor function. Joint hypermobility is associated with an increased incidence of motor delay in infancy. Over the ensuing six months most of the subjects will catch up. These findings, indicating a favourable prognosis, have implications regarding clinical assessment and parental counselling.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/adc.63.2.159

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A large Swedish study from 2004 reported a prevalence of 15% in girls and 6% in boys at age 12 if current age-specific recommendations of ≥6/9 on the Beighton score were applied.

    “A large Swedish study from 2004 reported a prevalence of 15% in girls and 6% in boys at the age of 12 years, if the current age-specific recommendations of ≥6/9 on the Beighton score were to be applied. 5”

    From No association between joint hypermobility, musculoskeletal pain and neurodevelopmental problems in a school-based sample of 11-year-old children (2025) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Patients and methods passage describes infants aged 8–14 months recruited in the Haifa area, not 12-year-olds in Sweden. The Abstract reports joint hypermobility among 715 infants, not prevalence of 15% in girls and 6% in boys under a ≥6/9 Beighton threshold. No page numbers are supplied for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In a 2004 Swedish study of 12-year-old children, 15% of the girls would have met the criteria for GJH if the current recommended cut-off of ≥6/9 had been applied.

    “In the 2004 study, 15% of the girls would have met the criteria for GJH if the current recommended cut-off of ≥6/9 had been applied. 5”

    From No association between joint hypermobility, musculoskeletal pain and neurodevelopmental problems in a school-based sample of 11-year-old children (2025) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Patients and methods passage describes infants aged 8–14 months recruited in the Haifa area, not 12-year-old children in a 2004 Swedish study. The Results report joint hypermobility and motor delay in infants; they do not report the claimed 15% of girls under a ≥6/9 cut-off. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Hormonal changes and onset of puberty are believed to influence joint hypermobility, with an expected increase in prevalence with age among girls and a decrease among boys.

    “These factors are believed to influence joint hypermobility, with an expected increase in prevalence with age among girls and a decrease among boys. 5,41”

    From No association between joint hypermobility, musculoskeletal pain and neurodevelopmental problems in a school-based sample of 11-year-old children (2025) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Results (page unavailable) associate joint hypermobility with younger age in infants but find no significant association with sex. The Discussion (page unavailable) likewise reports no significant sex association. A search for puberty, hormonal changes, and opposite age trends in girls and boys found no passage addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Dubowitz V. Muscle disorder in childhood. London: WB Saunders, 1978.
  2. Robson P. Shuffling, hitching, scooting or sliding: some observations in 30 otherwise normal children. Dev Med Child Neurol 1970;12:608-17.
  3. Benady S, Ivanans T. Hypermobile joints: a benign cause of transitory motor delay in infancy. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1978;17: 790-6.
  4. Frankenberg WK, van Doorninck WJ, Liddell TN, et al. The Denver prescreening developmental questionnaire (PDQ). Pediatrics 1976;57:744-53.
  5. Shapira Y, Harel S. Standardisation of the Denver Develop- mental Screening Test for Israeli children. Is J Med Sci 1983;19:246-50.
  6. Armitage P. Statistical methods in medical research. New York: John Wiley, 1971.
  7. Hagberg B, Lundberg A. Dissociated motor development simulating cerebral palsy. Neuropediatrie 1969;1:187-99.
  8. Haidvogl M. Dissociation of maturation: a distinct syndrome of delayed motor development. Dev Med Child Neurol 1979;21: 52-7.
  9. Kirk JA, Ansell BM, Bywaters GL. The hypermobility syn- drome, musculoskeletal complaints associated with generalised joint hypermobility. Ann Rheum Dis 1962;26:419-25.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jaffe, M., Tirosh, E., Cohen, A., & Taub, Y.
Affiliations
Haifa Medical Center (IL)
Venue
Archives of Disease in Childhood
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1988-02-01
Volume
63
Issue
2
Pages
159-161
ISSN
  • 0003-9888 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2044
OpenAlex
W1982517049
Cited by
45
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Disease in Childhood (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
joint hypermobility, motor development, motor delay, infants, hip abduction, elbow hyperextension, dorsiflexion, developmental prognosis, parental counseling
MeSH terms
Child Development, Female, Humans, Infant, Joint Instability, Male, Motor Skills, Socioeconomic Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review