The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antigliadin and antiendomysium antibody determination for coeliac disease.
Open accessAbstract
The value of IgG and IgA gliadin antibodies (AGA) was compared with that of IgA endomysium antibodies (EMA) for the diagnosis of coeliac disease. Three hundred and six of 340 (90%) children with untreated coeliac disease (flat mucosa) had EMA and 338/340 (99.4%) had IgG AGA and/or IgA AGA. Only 1/340 (a 7 year old boy with selective IgA deficiency) had neither AGA nor EMA. Absence of EMA is more frequent in coeliac patients younger than 2 years than in older patients (32/277 compared with 1/62). EMA were present in 4/211 (2%) of comparison subjects (normal mucosa), IgA AGA in 12/211 (6%), and IgG AGA in 74/211 (35%). The specificity of AGA cannot be calculated from these figures as they are biased. The combined determination of AGA and EMA, taking advantage of the high sensitivity of AGA and the high specificity of EMA, gives an excellent prediction of the condition of the mucosa: 247/248 patients (99.6%) with positive EMA and positive IgG AGA and IgA AGA had a flat mucosa, whereas 136/137 patients (99.3%) with neither AGA nor EMA had a normal mucosa. During a gluten free diet EMA and AGA disappear. Their presence or absence is therefore an indicator of dietary compliance. After reintroduction of gluten into the diet 110/134 (82%) of the patients who had a flat mucosa at diagnosis relapsed, but 24/134 still had a normal mucosa after 2-15 years of challenge. All these patients without a morphological relapse were less than 2 years old at diagnosis so we conclude that patients who are young at diagnosis should be challenged. AGA often reappear earlier than EMA. After one month of challenge 93% of patients are AGA and 69% EMA positive. After more than three years of gluten intake the percentage of AGA positive patients decreased to about 50% whereas the percentage of EMA positive sera was then highest (93%). Therefore EMA are more sensitive for the detection of 'silent' relapse after prolonged periods of gluten intake.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessment of diagnostic tests when disease verification is subject to selection bias
Begg, C. B., & Greenes, R. A. (1983) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530820 · Cited by 708
Cited by
The Oslo definitions for coeliac disease and related terms
Ludvigsson, J. F., Leffler, D. A., Bai, J. C., Biagi, F., Fasano, A., Green, P. H. R., Hadjivassiliou, M., Kaukinen, K., Kelly, C. P., Leonard, J. N., et al. (2013) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301346 · Cited by 1,721
Hill, I. D. (2005) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2005.02.012 · Cited by 324
Prevalence of celiac antibodies in children with neurologic disorders
Lahat, E., Broide, E., Leshem, M., Evans, S., & Scapa, E. (2000) · Pediatric Neurology · doi:10.1016/s0887-8994(00)00129-6 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Burgin-Wolff, A., Gaze, H., Hadziselimovic, F., Huber, H., Lentze, M. J., Nussle, D., & Reymond-Berthet, C.
- Venue
- Archives of Disease in Childhood
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1991-08-01
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 941-947
- ISSN
- 0003-9888 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2044
- OpenAlex
- W2128153629
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antigliadin and antiendomysium antibody determination for coeliac disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/adc.66.8.941
- The paper
- Burgin-Wolff, A., Gaze, H., Hadziselimovic, F., Huber, H., Lentze, M. J., Nussle, D., & Reymond-Berthet, C. (1991). Antigliadin and antiendomysium antibody determination for coeliac disease. Archives of Disease in Childhood. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.66.8.941
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.