The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Psychological development of prematurely born children
Open accessAbstract
Introduction Delirium is a severe neuropsychiatric syndrome of rapid onset, commonly precipitated by acute illness. It is common in older people in the emergency department (ED) and acute hospital, but greatly under-recognised in these and other settings. Delirium and other forms of cognitive impairment, particularly dementia, commonly coexist. There is a need for a rapid delirium screening tool that can be administered by a range of professional-level healthcare staff to patients with sensory or functional impairments in a busy clinical environment, which also incorporates general cognitive assessment. We developed the 4 ’A’s Test (4AT) for this purpose. This study’s primary objective is to validate the 4AT against a reference standard. Secondary objectives include (1) comparing the 4AT with another widely used test (the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM)); (2) determining if the 4AT is sensitive to general cognitive impairment; (3) assessing if 4AT scores predict outcomes, including (4) a health economic analysis. Methods and analysis 900 patients aged 70 or over in EDs or acute general medical wards will be recruited in three sites (Edinburgh, Bradford and Sheffield) over 18 months. Each patient will undergo a reference standard delirium assessment and will be randomised to assessment with either the 4AT or the CAM. At 12 weeks, outcomes (length of stay, institutionalisation and mortality) and resource utilisation will be collected by a questionnaire and via the electronic patient record. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was granted in Scotland and England. The study involves administering tests commonly used in clinical practice. The main ethical issues are the essential recruitment of people without capacity. Dissemination is planned via publication in high impact journals, presentation at conferences, social media and the website www.the4AT.com. Trial registration number ISRCTN53388093; Pre-results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Early experience alters brain function and structure
Als, H., Duffy, F. H., McAnulty, G. B., Rivkin, M. J., Vajapeyam, S., Mulkern, R. V., Warfield, S. K., Huppi, P. S., Butler, S. C., Conneman, N., et al. (2004) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.113.4.846 · Cited by 890
Jonas, R. A., Wypij, D., Roth, S. J., Bellinger, D. C., Visconti, K. J., du Plessis, A. J., Goodkin, H., Laussen, P. C., Farrell, D. M., Bartlett, J., et al. (2003) · The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.04.003 · Cited by 377
Behavioral Outcomes of Extremely Low Birth Weight Children at Age 8 Years
Hack, M., Taylor, H. G., Schluchter, M., Andreias, L., Drotar, D., & Klein, N. (2009) · Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics · doi:10.1097/dbp.0b013e31819e6a16 · Cited by 276
Educational and behavioural problems in babies of 32–35 weeks gestation
Huddy, C. L. J., Johnson, A., & Hope, P. L. (2001) · Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition · doi:10.1136/fn.85.1.f23 · Cited by 264
Feldman, R., Eidelman, A. I., & Rotenberg, N. (2004) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00816.x · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolke, D.
- Venue
- Archives of Disease in Childhood
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1998-06-01
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 567-570
- ISSN
- 0003-9888 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2044
- OpenAlex
- W2163590555
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychological development of prematurely born children. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/adc.78.6.567
- The paper
- Wolke, D. (1998). Psychological development of prematurely born children. Archives of Disease in Childhood. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.78.6.567
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.