Cited by 44Vaccine Coverage and HesitancyBehavioral Health and InterventionsMedia Influence and Health

Randomised controlled trial of the use of a modified postal reminder card on the uptake of measles vaccination

Open access
Hawe, P, McKenzie, N, Scurry, R·1998·Archives of Disease in Childhood

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether rewording postal reminder cards according to the "health belief model", a theory about preventive health behaviour, would help to improve measles vaccination rates. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial, with blind assessment of outcome status. Parents of children due for their first measles vaccination were randomised to one of two groups, one receiving the health belief model reminder card, the other receiving the usual, neutrally worded card. The proportion of children subsequently vaccinated in each group over a five week period was ascertained from clinical (provider based) records. SETTING: A local government operated public vaccination clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Parents of 259 children due for measles vaccination. MAIN RESULTS: The proportion of children vaccinated in the health belief model card group was 79% compared with 67% of those sent the usual card (95% CI, 2% to 23%), a modest but important improvement. CONCLUSION: This study illustrates how the effectiveness of a minimal and widely practised intervention to promote vaccination compliance can be improved with negligible additional effort.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/adc.79.2.136

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Galloway T. Management of vaccination and immunisation procedures by electronic computer. Med OYcer 1963;109:232-3.
  2. Byrne EB, SchaeVer W, Dini EF, Case GE. Infant immuni- sation surveillance: cost vs eVect. J Am Med Assoc 1979;212:770-3.
  3. Job RFS. EVective and ineVective use of fear in health pro- motion campaigns. Am J Public Health 1988;78:163-7.
  4. Larson EB, Bergman J, Heidrich F, Alvin BL, Schneeweiss R. Do postcards improve influenza vaccination compli- ance? Med Care 1982;20:639-48.
  5. Thompson S. Programme management: immunisation in Victoria. Address to the 3rd National Immunisation Conference. Public Health Association of Australia. Melbourne, April 1993.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hawe, P., McKenzie, N., & Scurry, R.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Hawe, P
ORCID
Hawe, P
Venue
Archives of Disease in Childhood
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1998-08-01
Volume
79
Issue
2
Pages
136-140
ISSN
  • 0003-9888 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2044
OpenAlex
W2161601925
Cited by
44
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Disease in Childhood (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
measles vaccination, vaccine uptake, Health Belief Model, preventive health behavior, childhood immunization, health communication
MeSH terms
Adult, Health Promotion, Humans, Infant, Language, Measles Vaccine, New South Wales, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Compliance, Postal Service, Vaccination, Health Behavior, Reminder Systems, Immunization Programs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review