The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic review of the occurrence of infantile colic in the community
Open accessAbstract
AIMS: To assess the occurrence of infantile colic in the community and the need for professional help; and to study the influences of potential determinants of infantile colic. METHODS: Surveys were identified by a systematic search in Medline (1966-98) and Embase (1988-98). Retrieved publications were checked for references. Studies selected were community based, prospective, and retrospective surveys on the occurrence of infantile colic published in English, German, French, or Dutch. Occurrence rates were calculated as percentages. Methodological quality of the surveys was assessed by two assessors independently with a standardised criteria list containing items on method of data gathering, definition of colic, and drop out rate. RESULTS: Fifteen community based surveys were identified. The methodological quality varied considerably and was generally low. Even the two most methodologically sound prospective studies yielded widely varying cumulative incidence rates of 5-19%. Referral rates or the need to seek help because of crying were consistently lower than occurrence rates for prolonged crying as such. Gender, socioeconomic class, type of feeding, family history of atopy, and parental smoking were not shown to be associated with colic. CONCLUSION: Occurrence rates of infantile colic vary greatly according to methodological quality. A considerable number of parents reporting prolonged crying do not seek or need professional help.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Practical Statistics for Medical Research
Altman, D. G. (1990) · doi:10.1201/9780429258589 · Cited by 10,668
Cited by
Systematic review and meta-analysis: fussing and crying durations and prevalence of colic in infants
Wolke, D., Bilgin, A., & Samara, M. (2017) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.02.020 · Cited by 255
Vandenplas, Y., Abkari, A., Bellaiche, M., Benninga, M., Chouraqui, J. P., Çokura, F., Harb, T., Hegar, B., Lifschitz, C., Ludwig, T., et al. (2015) · Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · doi:10.1097/mpg.0000000000000949 · Cited by 253
van Hemert, S., Breedveld, A. C., Rovers, J. M. P., Vermeiden, J. P. W., Witteman, B. J. M., Smits, M. G., & de Roos, N. M. (2014) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2014.00241 · Cited by 150
Paternal depressive symptoms during pregnancy are related to excessive infant crying
van den Berg, M. P., van der Ende, J., Crijnen, A. A. M., Jaddoe, V. W. V., Moll, H. A., Mackenbach, J. P., Hofman, A., Hengeveld, M. W., Tiemeier, H., & Verhulst, F. C. (2009) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2008-3100 · Cited by 127
Excessive infant crying: definitions determine risk groups
Reijneveld, S. A. (2002) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/adc.87.1.43 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Lucassen, P. L. B. J.
- Venue
- Archives of Disease in Childhood
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2001-05-01
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 398-403
- ISSN
- 0003-9888 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118718487
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic review of the occurrence of infantile colic in the community. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/adc.84.5.398
- The paper
- Lucassen, P. L. B. J. (2001). Systematic review of the occurrence of infantile colic in the community. Archives of Disease in Childhood. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.84.5.398
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.