The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An evidence and consensus based guideline for acute diarrhoea management
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop an evidence and consensus based guideline for the management of the child who presents to hospital with diarrhoea (with or without vomiting), a common problem representing 16% of all paediatric medical attenders at an accident and emergency department. Clinical assessment, investigations (biochemistry and stool culture in particular), admission, and treatment are addressed. The guideline aims to aid junior doctors in recognising children who need admission for observation and treatment and those who may safely go home. EVIDENCE: A systematic review of the literature was performed. Selected articles were appraised, graded, and synthesised qualitatively. Statements on recommendation were generated. CONSENSUS: An anonymous, postal Delphi consensus process was used. A panel of 39 selected medical and nursing staff were asked to grade their agreement with the generated statements. They were sent the papers, appraisals, and literature review. On the second and third rounds they were asked to re-grade their agreement in the light of other panellists' responses. Consensus was predefined as 83% of panellists agreeing with the statement. RECOMMENDATIONS: Clinical signs useful in assessment of level of dehydration were agreed. Admission to a paediatric facility is advised for children who show signs of dehydration. For those with mild to moderate dehydration, estimated deficit is replaced over four hours with oral rehydration solution (glucose based, 200–250 mOsm/l) given “little and often”. A nasogastric tube should be used if fluid is refused and normal feeds started following rehydration. Children at high risk of dehydration should be observed to ensure at least maintenance fluid is tolerated. Management of more severe dehydration is detailed. Antidiarrhoeal medication is not indicated. VALIDATION: The guideline has been successfully implemented and evaluated in a paediatric accident and emergency department.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Schaller, M., Almeida, L. M. C., Bewley, A., Cribier, B., Del Rosso, J., Dlova, N. C., Gallo, R. L., Granstein, R. D., Kautz, G., Mannis, M. J., et al. (2020) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.18420 · Cited by 253
Antimotility agents for chronic diarrhoea in people with HIV/AIDS
Nwachukwu, C. E., & Okebe, J. U. (2008) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005644.pub2 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Armon, K., Stephenson, T., MacFaul, R., Eccleston, P., & Werneke, U.
- Venue
- Archives of Disease in Childhood
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2001-08-01
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 132-142
- ISSN
- 0003-9888 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2044
- OpenAlex
- W2124892946
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An evidence and consensus based guideline for acute diarrhoea management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/adc.85.2.132
- The paper
- Armon, K., Stephenson, T., MacFaul, R., Eccleston, P., & Werneke, U. (2001). An evidence and consensus based guideline for acute diarrhoea management. Archives of Disease in Childhood. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.85.2.132
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.