The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROS acea CO nsensus 2019 panel
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: A transition from a subtyping to a phenotyping approach in rosacea is underway, allowing individual patient management according to presenting features instead of categorization by predefined subtypes. The ROSacea COnsensus (ROSCO) 2017 recommendations further support this transition and align with guidance from other working groups. OBJECTIVES: To update and extend previous global ROSCO recommendations in line with the latest research and continue supporting uptake of the phenotype approach in rosacea through clinical tool development. METHODS: Nineteen dermatologists and two ophthalmologists used a modified Delphi approach to reach consensus on statements pertaining to critical aspects of rosacea diagnosis, classification and management. Voting was electronic and blinded. RESULTS: Delphi statements on which the panel achieved consensus of ≥ 75% voting 'Agree' or 'Strongly agree' are presented. The panel recommends discussing disease burden with patients during consultations, using four questions to assist conversations. The primary treatment objective should be achievement of complete clearance, owing to previously established clinical benefits for patients. Cutaneous and ocular features are defined. Treatments have been reassessed in line with recent evidence and the prior treatment algorithm updated. Combination therapy is recommended to benefit patients with multiple features. Ongoing monitoring and dialogue should take place between physician and patients, covering defined factors to maximize outcomes. A prototype clinical tool (Rosacea Tracker) and patient case studies have been developed from consensus statements. CONCLUSIONS: The current survey updates previous recommendations as a basis for local guideline development and provides clinical tools to facilitate a phenotype approach in practice and improve rosacea patient management. What's already known about this topic? A transition to a phenotype approach in rosacea is underway and is being recommended by multiple working groups. New research has become available since the previous ROSCO consensus, necessitating an update and extension of recommendations. What does this study add? We offer updated global recommendations for clinical practice that account for recent research, to continue supporting the transition to a phenotype approach in rosacea. We present prototype clinical tools to facilitate use of the phenotype approach in practice and improve management of patients with rosacea.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qualitative Research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research
Jones, J., & Hunter, D. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7001.376 · Cited by 3,471
Wilkin, J., Dahl, M., Detmar, M., Drake, L., Feinstein, A., Odom, R., & Powell, F. (2002) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1067/mjd.2002.120625 · Cited by 917
Gallo, R. L., Granstein, R. D., Kang, S., Mannis, M., Steinhoff, M., Tan, J., & Thiboutot, D. (2018) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2017.08.037 · Cited by 512
Self-citationvan Zuuren, E. J., Fedorowicz, Z., Carter, B., van der Linden, M. M., & Charland, L. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003262.pub5 · Cited by 269
Powell, F. C. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcp042829 · Cited by 262
Using the Delphi Method for Qualitative, Participatory Action Research in Health Leadership
Fletcher, A. J., & Marchildon, G. P. (2014) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/160940691401300101 · Cited by 254
Rosacea: Molecular Mechanisms and Management of a Chronic Cutaneous Inflammatory Condition
Woo, Y., Lim, J., Cho, D., & Park, H. (2016) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms17091562 · Cited by 196
An evidence and consensus based guideline for acute diarrhoea management
Armon, K., Stephenson, T., MacFaul, R., Eccleston, P., & Werneke, U. (2001) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/adc.85.2.132 · Cited by 173
Rosacea treatment update: recommendations from the global ROS acea CO nsensus ( ROSCO ) panel
Schaller, M., Almeida, L. M. C., Bewley, A., Cribier, B., Dlova, N. C., Kautz, G., Mannis, M., Oon, H. H., Rajagopalan, M., Steinhoff, M., et al. (2017) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.15173 · Cited by 158
Self-citationvan Zuuren, E. J., Fedorowicz, Z., Tan, J. K. L., van der Linden, M. M. D., Arents, B. W. M., Carter, B., & Charland, L. (2018) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.17590 · Cited by 157
Self-citation
Cited by
Rosacea: New Concepts in Classification and Treatment
van Zuuren, E. J., Arents, B. W. M., van der Linden, M. M. D., Vermeulen, S., Fedorowicz, Z., & Tan, J. (2021) · American Journal of Clinical Dermatology · doi:10.1007/s40257-021-00595-7 · Cited by 339
Self-citationZhao, Z., Wu, C.-M., Zhang, S., He, F., Liu, F., Wang, B., Huang, Y., Shi, W., Jian, D., Xie, H., et al. (2021) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/23415 · Cited by 58
“Nowadays, with the growing understanding of rosacea, this traditional subtype classification has been abrogated by the experts committee for rosacea due to the impractical sorting criteria [34].”
BackgroundBarraza, G. A., Castro-Guijarro, A. C., de la Fuente Hoffmann, V., Bolívar Ávila, S. J., Flamini, M. I., & Sanchez, A. M. (2024) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108988 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Schaller, M., Almeida, L. M. C., Bewley, A., Cribier, B., Del Rosso, J., Dlova, N. C., Gallo, R. L., Granstein, R. D., Kautz, G., Mannis, M. J., Micali, G., Oon, H. H., Rajagopalan, M., Steinhoff, M., Tanghetti, E., Thiboutot, D., Troielli, P., Webster, G., Zierhut, M., Zuuren, E. J., & Tan, J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Dermatology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-10-16
- Volume
- 182
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1269-1276
- ISSN
- 0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2133
- OpenAlex
- W2967093367
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 17.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROS acea CO nsensus 2019 panel. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/bjd.18420
- The paper
- Schaller, M., Almeida, L. M. C., Bewley, A., Cribier, B., Del Rosso, J., Dlova, N. C., Gallo, R. L., Granstein, R. D., Kautz, G., Mannis, M. J., Micali, G., Oon, H. H., Rajagopalan, M., Steinhoff, M., Tanghetti, E., Thiboutot, D., Troielli, P., Webster, G., Zierhut, M., . . . Tan, J. (2020). Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROS acea CO nsensus 2019 panel. British Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18420
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.