The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Severe and unrecognised: pertussis in UK infants
Open accessAbstract
AIMS: To diagnose pertussis using culture, polymerase chain reaction, and serology, in children admitted to intensive care units (PICUs) and some paediatric wards in London, and in their household contacts to determine the source of infection. METHODS: Infants <5 months old admitted to London PICUs between 1998 and 2000 with respiratory failure, apnoea and/or bradycardia, or acute life threatening episodes (ALTE), and children <15 years admitted to paediatric wards at St Mary's and St George's Hospitals between 1999 and 2000 with lower respiratory tract infection, apnoea, or ALTE were studied. RESULTS: Sixty seven per cent of eligible children (142/212) were recruited; 23% (33/142) had pertussis, 19.8% (25/126) on the PICU and 50% (8/16) on wards. Two died. Only 4% (6/142) were culture positive. Pertussis was clinically suspected on admission in 28% of infants (7/25) on the PICU and 75% (6/8) on the wards. Infants on PICU with pertussis coughed for longer, had apnoeas and whooped more often, and a higher lymphocyte count than infants without pertussis. Pertussis and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) co-infection was frequent (11/33, 33%). Pertussis was confirmed in 22/33 (67%) of those who were first to become ill in the family. For 14/33 children the source of infection was a parent; for 9/33 the source of pertussis was an older fully vaccinated child in the household. CONCLUSIONS: Severe pertussis is under diagnosed. An RSV diagnosis does not exclude pertussis. Future changes to the UK vaccination programme should aim to reduce pertussis transmission to young infants by their parents and older siblings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deaths from pertussis are underestimated in England
Crowcroft, N. S. (2002) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/adc.86.5.336 · Cited by 113
Self-citation
Cited by
Effectiveness of maternal pertussis vaccination in England: an observational study
Amirthalingam, G., Andrews, N., Campbell, H., Ribeiro, S., Kara, E., Donegan, K., Fry, N. K., Miller, E., & Ramsay, M. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60686-3 · Cited by 739
Dabrera, G., Amirthalingam, G., Andrews, N., Campbell, H., Ribeiro, S., Kara, E., Fry, N. K., & Ramsay, M. (2015) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciu821 · Cited by 385
Ridda, I., Yin, J. K., King, C., Raina MacIntyre, C., & McIntyre, P. (2012) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.08.079 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Crowcroft, N. S.
- Venue
- Archives of Disease in Childhood
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2003-09-01
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 802-806
- ISSN
- 0003-9888 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2044
- OpenAlex
- W2167342627
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Severe and unrecognised: pertussis in UK infants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/adc.88.9.802
- The paper
- Crowcroft, N. S. (2003). Severe and unrecognised: pertussis in UK infants. Archives of Disease in Childhood. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.88.9.802
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.