Cited by 65AI in cancer detectionImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesCell Image Analysis Techniques

ImageMiner: a software system for comparative analysis of tissue microarrays using content-based image retrieval, high-performance computing, and grid technology

Open access
Foran, David J, Yang, Lin, Chen, Wenjin, Hu, Jun, Goodell, Lauri A, Reiss, Michael, Wang, Fusheng, Kurc, Tahsin +3 more·2011·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: The design and implementation of ImageMiner, a software platform for performing comparative analysis of expression patterns in imaged microscopy specimens such as tissue microarrays (TMAs), is described. ImageMiner is a federated system of services that provides a reliable set of analytical and data management capabilities for investigative research applications in pathology. It provides a library of image processing methods, including automated registration, segmentation, feature extraction, and classification, all of which have been tailored, in these studies, to support TMA analysis. The system is designed to leverage high-performance computing machines so that investigators can rapidly analyze large ensembles of imaged TMA specimens. To support deployment in collaborative, multi-institutional projects, ImageMiner features grid-enabled, service-based components so that multiple instances of ImageMiner can be accessed remotely and federated. RESULTS: The experimental evaluation shows that: (1) ImageMiner is able to support reliable detection and feature extraction of tumor regions within imaged tissues; (2) images and analysis results managed in ImageMiner can be searched for and retrieved on the basis of image-based features, classification information, and any correlated clinical data, including any metadata that have been generated to describe the specified tissue and TMA; and (3) the system is able to reduce computation time of analyses by exploiting computing clusters, which facilitates analysis of larger sets of tissue samples.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000170

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Solomonides A, McClatchey R, Odeh M, et al. MammoGrid and eDiamond: Grids Applications in Mammogram Analysis. Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference: e-Society 2003. Lisbon, Portugal, 2003:1032e3.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foran, D. J., Yang, L., Chen, W., Hu, J., Goodell, L. A., Reiss, M., Wang, F., Kurc, T., Pan, T., Sharma, A., & Saltz, J. H.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers Cancer Institute (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Chen, Wenjin
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2011-07
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
403-415
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W2124752499
Cited by
65
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0615155, 0403342, DE-AC02–06CH11357)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE‐ AC02‐06CH11357, AC02‐06CH11357, 06CH11357, DE-AC02-)
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • National Institutes of Health (n01co12400-79-0-22, N01-CO-12400, DE-AC02–06CH11357, NIH U54, UL1TR000454, 5p20eb000591-03)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (79077CBS10, 94995NBS23, 85983CBS43, 29XS154)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R24HL085343)
  • National Cancer Institute (N01CO12400, N01-CO-012400, DE-AC02-06CH11357, U24CA180924, U54CA113001, R01CA156386, P30CA072720)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (P20-EB000591)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (R01LM011119, R01LM009239)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025008)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Keywords
tissue microarray, content-based image retrieval, high-performance computing, grid computing, service-oriented architecture, image registration, image segmentation, feature extraction, tumor detection, pathology informatics, microscopy image analysis
MeSH terms
Database Management Systems, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Software Design, United States, Information Dissemination, Tissue Array Analysis, Data Mining

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review