Cited by 68Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementUsability and User Interface Design

An offline mobile nutrition monitoring intervention for varying-literacy patients receiving hemodialysis: a pilot study examining usage and usability

Open access
Connelly, Kay, Siek, Katie A, Chaudry, Beenish, Jones, Josette, Astroth, Kim, Welch, Janet L·2012·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Design and evaluation of the dietary intake monitoring application (DIMA) to assist varying-literacy patients receiving hemodialysis to adhere to their prescribed dietary regimen. METHODS: An iterative, user-centered design process informed by Bandura's social cognitive theory was employed to design DIMA--a mobile application that utilizes touch-screen, visual interfaces; barcode scanning; and voice recording to assist varying-literacy patients receiving hemodialysis to self-monitor their diet. A pilot field study was conducted where 18 patients receiving hemodialysis were recruited face-to-face from two dialysis facilities to use DIMA for 6 weeks. Subjects recorded their dietary intake using DIMA and met with research assistants three times each week. All interactions with DIMA were logged. Subjects' interdialytic weight gain was recorded throughout the study. At the end of the study, two face-to-face questionnaires were administered to assess usability and context of use. RESULTS: Subjects were able to use DIMA successfully--12 subjects used DIMA as much or more at the end of the study as they did at the beginning and reported that DIMA helped them change their diet. Subjects had difficulty using the barcode scanner. Viewing past meals was the most used of the reflection mechanisms in DIMA. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that while many design features were useful, some could be improved. In particular, future versions of DIMA will be on a smartphone using a camera for barcode scanning, integrate feedback and past meal reflection into the normal flow of the application, and support visual cues when selecting food items.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000732

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The finding strengthens the conclusions in recent studies that smartphones would be more suitable platforms for a support tool for self-management of lifestyle-related diseases than contemporary mobile phones or PDAs.

    “The finding strengthens the conclusions in recent studies [66,67] that smartphones would be more suitable platforms for a support tool for self-management of lifestyle-related diseases than contemporary mobile phones or PDAs.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Murphy PW, Davis TC, Long SW, et al. Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a quick reading test for patients. J Read 1993;37:124e30.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Connelly, K., Siek, K. A., Chaudry, B., Jones, J., Astroth, K., & Welch, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
  • Illinois State University (US)
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
Corresponding author
Connelly, Kay
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2012-09
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
705-712
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W2118494051
Cited by
68
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
10.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (T32NR007066)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R21EB007083)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
dietary monitoring, hemodialysis, low literacy, mobile health apps, self-monitoring, dietary adherence, usability, barcode scanning, voice recording, interdialytic weight gain, social cognitive theory, user-centered design, reflection mechanism
MeSH terms
Attitude to Computers, Diet, Female, Renal Dialysis, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Pilot Projects, Self Care, Software Design, United States, User-Computer Interface, Diet Records, Patient Satisfaction, Computers, Handheld, Health Records, Personal, Health Literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review