A study in transfer learning: leveraging data from multiple hospitals to enhance hospital-specific predictions
Open accessAbstract
Background Data-driven risk stratification models built using data from a single hospital often have a paucity of training data. However, leveraging data from other hospitals can be challenging owing to institutional differences with patients and with data coding and capture. Objective To investigate three approaches to learning hospital-specific predictions about the risk of hospital-associated infection with Clostridium difficile, and perform a comparative analysis of the value of different ways of using external data to enhance hospital-specific predictions. Materials and methods We evaluated each approach on 132 853 admissions from three hospitals, varying in size and location. The first approach was a single-task approach, in which only training data from the target hospital (ie, the hospital for which the model was intended) were used. The second used only data from the other two hospitals. The third approach jointly incorporated data from all hospitals while seeking a solution in the target space. Results The relative performance of the three different approaches was found to be sensitive to the hospital selected as the target. However, incorporating data from all hospitals consistently had the highest performance. Discussion The results characterize the challenges and opportunities that come with (1) using data or models from collections of hospitals without adapting them to the site at which the model will be used, and (2) using only local data to build models for sm…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Transfer learning adapts models trained at one hospital for use at another using small amounts of local data.
“and transfer learning, which adapts models trained at one hospital for use at another using small amounts of local data [25, 59].”
From Toward generalizable and interpretable machine learning models in healthcare: Insights from ICU outcome predictions (2026) · cites this paper as [59]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Weiss, K., Khoshgoftaar, T. M., & Wang, D. (2016) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-016-0043-6 · Cited by 6,260 · see citing works
Goldstein, B. A., Navar, A. M., Pencina, M. J., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocw042 · Cited by 936 · see citing works
Machine Learning for Healthcare: On the Verge of a Major Shift in Healthcare Epidemiology
Wiens, J., & Shenoy, E. S. (2018) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cix731 · Cited by 574 · see citing works
Self-citation"The human body is a black box": supporting clinical decision-making with deep learning
Sendak, M., Elish, M. C., Gao, M., Futoma, J., Ratliff, W., Nichols, M., Bedoya, A., Balu, S., & O'Brien, C. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372827 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
A Path for Translation of Machine Learning Products into Healthcare Delivery
(2020) · EMJ Innovations · doi:10.33590/emjinnov/19-00172 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Language models are an effective representation learning technique for electronic health record data
Steinberg, E., Jung, K., Fries, J. A., Corbin, C. K., Pfohl, S. R., & Shah, N. H. (2021) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103637 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Detecting and Remediating Harmful Data Shifts for the Responsible Deployment of Clinical AI Models
Subasri, V., Krishnan, A., Kore, A., Dhalla, A., Pandya, D., Wang, B., Malkin, D., Razak, F., Verma, A. A., Goldenberg, A., et al. (2025) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.13685 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Kamran, F., Tang, S., Otles, E., McEvoy, D. S., Saleh, S. N., Gong, J., Li, B. Y., Dutta, S., Liu, X., Medford, R. J., et al. (2022) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2021-068576 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Self-citationPredicting Clinical Outcomes Across Changing Electronic Health Record Systems
Gong, J. J., Naumann, T., Szolovits, P., & Guttag, J. V. (2017) · Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3097983.3098064 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationGeneralizability of predictive models for intensive care unit patients
Johnson, A. E. W., Pollard, T. J., & Naumann, T. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1812.02275 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Bohlen, L., Rosenberger, J., Hambauer, N., Zähringer, D., Franz, V., Zschech, P., & Kraus, M. (2026) · Health Care Management Science · doi:10.1007/s10729-026-09760-y
- Authors
- Wiens, J., Guttag, J., & Horvitz, E.
- Affiliations
- MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (US)
- Microsoft (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-07-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 699-706
- ISSN
- 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-974X
- PMC
- PMC4078276
- OpenAlex
- W2132755184
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 5.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Microsoft Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- transfer learning, Clostridium difficile infection, nosocomial infections, risk stratification, external data, small hospitals, rare events
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Child, Preschool, Clostridium Infections, Cross Infection, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, United States, Models, Statistical, Logistic Models, Clostridioides difficile, Risk Assessment, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review