Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 218

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Validating drug repurposing signals using electronic health records: a case study of metformin associated with reduced cancer mortality

Open access
Xu, Hua, Aldrich, Melinda C, Chen, Qingxia, Liu, Hongfang, Peterson, Neeraja B, Dai, Qi, Levy, Mia, Shah, Anushi, Han, Xue, Ruan, Xiaoyang, Jiang, Min, Li, Ying, Julien, Jamii St, Warner, Jeremy, Friedman, Carol, Roden, Dan M, Denny, Joshua C·2015·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

Objectives Drug repurposing, which finds new indications for existing drugs, has received great attention recently. The goal of our work is to assess the feasibility of using electronic health records (EHRs) and automated informatics methods to efficiently validate a recent drug repurposing association of metformin with reduced cancer mortality. Methods By linking two large EHRs from Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Mayo Clinic to their tumor registries, we constructed a cohort including 32 415 adults with a cancer diagnosis at Vanderbilt and 79 258 cancer patients at Mayo from 1995 to 2010. Using automated informatics methods, we further identified type 2 diabetes patients within the cancer cohort and determined their drug exposure information, as well as other covariates such as smoking status. We then estimated HRs for all-cause mortality and their associated 95% CIs using stratified Cox proportional hazard models. HRs were estimated according to metformin exposure, adjusted for age at diagnosis, sex, race, body mass index, tobacco use, insulin use, cancer type, and non-cancer Charlson comorbidity index. Results Among all Vanderbilt cancer patients, metformin was associated with a 22% decrease in overall mortality compared to other oral hypoglycemic medications (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.69 to 0.88) and with a 39% decrease compared to type 2 diabetes patients on insulin only (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.50 to 0.73). Diabetic patients on metformin also had a 23% improved survival compared with non-diabetic patients (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.71 to 0.85). These associations were replicated using the Mayo Clinic EHR data. Many site-specific cancers including breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate demonstrated reduced mortality with metformin use in at least one EHR. Conclusions EHR data suggested that the use of metformin was associated with decreased mortality after a cancer diagnosis compared with diabetic and non-diabetic cancer patients not on metformin, indicating its potential as a chemotherapeutic regimen. This study serves as a model for robust and inexpensive validation studies for drug repurposing signals using EHR data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002649

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

See all 218

Metadata

Authors
Xu, H., Aldrich, M. C., Chen, Q., Liu, H., Peterson, N. B., Dai, Q., Levy, M., Shah, A., Han, X., Ruan, X., Jiang, M., Li, Y., Julien, J. S., Warner, J., Friedman, C., Roden, D. M., & Denny, J. C.
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2014-07-22
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
179-191
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W2105050951
Cited by
218
References
16
FWCI
8.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validating drug repurposing signals using electronic health records: a case study of metformin associated with reduced cancer mortality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002649
The paper
Xu, H., Aldrich, M. C., Chen, Q., Liu, H., Peterson, N. B., Dai, Q., Levy, M., Shah, A., Han, X., Ruan, X., Jiang, M., Li, Y., Julien, J. S., Warner, J., Friedman, C., Roden, D. M., & Denny, J. C. (2015). Validating drug repurposing signals using electronic health records: a case study of metformin associated with reduced cancer mortality. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002649

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.