The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficacy and safety of strontium ranelate in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: results of a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Strontium ranelate is currently used for osteoporosis. The international, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled Strontium ranelate Efficacy in Knee OsteoarthrItis triAl evaluated its effect on radiological progression of knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: Patients with knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren and Lawrence grade 2 or 3, and joint space width (JSW) 2.5-5 mm) were randomly allocated to strontium ranelate 1 g/day (n=558), 2 g/day (n=566) or placebo (n=559). The primary endpoint was radiographical change in JSW (medial tibiofemoral compartment) over 3 years versus placebo. Secondary endpoints included radiological progression, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, and knee pain. The trial is registered (ISRCTN41323372). RESULTS: The intention-to-treat population included 1371 patients. Treatment with strontium ranelate was associated with smaller degradations in JSW than placebo (1 g/day: -0.23 (SD 0.56) mm; 2 g/day: -0.27 (SD 0.63) mm; placebo: -0.37 (SD 0.59) mm); treatment-placebo differences were 0.14 (SE 0.04), 95% CI 0.05 to 0.23, p<0.001 for 1 g/day and 0.10 (SE 0.04), 95% CI 0.02 to 0.19, p=0.018 for 2 g/day. Fewer radiological progressors were observed with strontium ranelate (p<0.001 and p=0.012 for 1 and 2 g/day). There were greater reductions in total WOMAC score (p=0.045), pain subscore (p=0.028), physical function subscore (p=0.099) and knee pain (p=0.065) with strontium ranelate 2 g/day. Strontium ranelate was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with strontium ranelate 1 and 2 g/day is associated with a significant effect on structure in patients with knee osteoarthritis, and a beneficial effect on symptoms for strontium ranelate 2 g/day.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genetic epidemiology of hip and knee osteoarthritis
Valdes, A. M., & Spector, T. D. (2011) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2010.191 · Cited by 256 · cited 1×
“This supports published evidence for different aetiological pathways in structural and symptomatic osteoarthritis.(29) Osteoarthritic pain may have several causes (synovitis, osteophytes and bone marrow oedema), which are all related to inflammation or bone, rather than cartilage, which is considered to be aneural.”
Self-citation
Cited by
Glyn-Jones, S., Palmer, A. J. R., Agricola, R., Price, A. J., Vincent, T. L., Weinans, H., & Carr, A. J. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60802-3 · Cited by 3,151
The epidemiology and impact of pain in osteoarthritis
Neogi, T. (2013) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2013.03.018 · Cited by 1,730
Low-grade inflammation as a key mediator of the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis
Robinson, W. H., Lepus, C. M., Wang, Q., Raghu, H., Mao, R., Lindstrom, T. M., & Sokolove, J. (2016) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2016.136 · Cited by 1,438
Abramoff, B., & Caldera, F. E. (2020) · Medical Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2019.10.007 · Cited by 1,191
Value of biomarkers in osteoarthritis: current status and perspectives
Lotz, M., Martel-Pelletier, J., Christiansen, C., Brandi, M.-L., Bruyère, O., Chapurlat, R., Collette, J., Cooper, C., Giacovelli, G., Kanis, J. A., et al. (2013) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203726 · Cited by 328
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Reginster, J.-Y., Badurski, J., Bellamy, N., Bensen, W., Chapurlat, R., Chevalier, X., Christiansen, C., Genant, H., Navarro, F., Nasonov, E., Sambrook, P. N., Spector, T. D., & Cooper, C.
- Venue
- Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 179-186
- ISSN
- 0003-4967 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104005171
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.