Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 654

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study to demonstrate equivalence in efficacy and safety of CT-P13 compared with innovator infliximab when coadministered with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: the PLANETRA study

Open access
Yoo, Dae Hyun, Hrycaj, Pawel, Miranda, Pedro, Ramiterre, Edgar, Piotrowski, Mariusz, Shevchuk, Sergii, Kovalenko, Volodymyr, Prodanovic, Nenad, Abello-Banfi, Mauricio, Gutierrez-Ureña, Sergio, Morales-Olazabal, Luis, Tee, Michael, Jimenez, Renato, Zamani, Omid, Lee, Sang Joon, Kim, HoUng, Park, Won, Müller-Ladner, Ulf·2013·Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of innovator infliximab (INX) and CT-P13, an INX biosimilar, in active rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) treatment. METHODS: Phase III randomised, double-blind, multicentre, multinational, parallel-group study. Patients with active disease despite MTX (12.5-25 mg/week) were randomised to receive 3 mg/kg of CT-P13 (n=302) or INX (n=304) with MTX and folic acid. The primary endpoint was the American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response at week 30. Therapeutic equivalence of clinical response according to ACR20 criteria was concluded if the 95% CI for the treatment difference was within ±15%. Secondary endpoints included ACR response criteria, European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria, change in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28), Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), Simplified Disease Activity Index, Clinical Disease Activity Index, as well as pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters, safety and immunogenicity. RESULTS: At week 30, ACR20 responses were 60.9% for CT-P13 and 58.6% for INX (95% CI -6% to 10%) in the intention-to-treat population. The proportions in CT-P13 and INX groups achieving good or moderate EULAR responses (C reactive protein (CRP)) at week 30 were 85.8% and 87.1%, respectively. Low disease activity or remission according to DAS28-CRP, ACR-EULAR remission rates, ACR50/ACR70 responses and all other PK and PD endpoints were highly similar at week 30. Incidence of drug-related adverse events (35.2% vs 35.9%) and detection of antidrug antibodies (48.4% vs 48.2%) were highly similar for CT-P13 and INX, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CT-P13 demonstrated equivalent efficacy to INX at week 30, with a comparable PK profile and immunogenicity. CT-P13 was well tolerated, with a safety profile comparable with that of INX. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01217086.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-203090

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 654

Metadata

Authors
Yoo, D. H., Hrycaj, P., Miranda, P., Ramiterre, E., Piotrowski, M., Shevchuk, S., Kovalenko, V., Prodanovic, N., Abello-Banfi, M., Gutierrez-Ureña, S., Morales-Olazabal, L., Tee, M., Jimenez, R., Zamani, O., Lee, S. J., Kim, H., Park, W., & Müller-Ladner, U.
Venue
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
72
Issue
10
Pages
1613-1620
ISSN
0003-4967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121050884
Cited by
654
References
0
FWCI
34.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study to demonstrate equivalence in efficacy and safety of CT-P13 compared with innovator infliximab when coadministered with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: the PLANETRA study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-203090
The paper
Yoo, D. H., Hrycaj, P., Miranda, P., Ramiterre, E., Piotrowski, M., Shevchuk, S., Kovalenko, V., Prodanovic, N., Abello-Banfi, M., Gutierrez-Ureña, S., Morales-Olazabal, L., Tee, M., Jimenez, R., Zamani, O., Lee, S. J., Kim, H., Park, W., & Müller-Ladner, U. (2013). A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study to demonstrate equivalence in efficacy and safety of CT-P13 compared with innovator infliximab when coadministered with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: the PLANETRA study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-203090

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.