Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 832

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence-based detection of pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis: the DETECT study

Open access
Coghlan, J Gerry, Denton, Christopher P, Grünig, Ekkehard, Bonderman, Diana, Distler, Oliver, Khanna, Dinesh, Müller-Ladner, Ulf, Pope, Janet E, Vonk, Madelon C, Doelberg, Martin, Chadha-Boreham, Harbajan, Heinzl, Harald, Rosenberg, Daniel M, McLaughlin, Vallerie V, Seibold, James R·2014·Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Earlier detection of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), a leading cause of death in systemic sclerosis (SSc), facilitates earlier treatment. The objective of this study was to develop the first evidence-based detection algorithm for PAH in SSc. METHODS: In this cross-sectional, international study conducted in 62 experienced centres from North America, Europe and Asia, adults with SSc at increased risk of PAH (SSc for >3 years and predicted pulmonary diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide <60%) underwent a broad panel of non-invasive assessments followed by diagnostic right heart catheterisation (RHC). Univariable and multivariable analyses selected the best discriminatory variables for identifying PAH. After assessment for clinical plausibility and feasibility, these were incorporated into a two-step, internally validated detection algorithm. Nomograms for clinical practice use were developed. RESULTS: Of 466 SSc patients at increased risk of PAH, 87 (19%) had RHC-confirmed PAH. PAH was mild (64% in WHO functional class I/II). Six simple assessments in Step 1 of the algorithm determined referral to echocardiography. In Step 2, the Step 1 prediction score and two echocardiographic variables determined referral to RHC. The DETECT algorithm recommended RHC in 62% of patients (referral rate) and missed 4% of PAH patients (false negatives). By comparison, applying European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines to these patients, 29% of diagnoses were missed while requiring an RHC referral rate of 40%. CONCLUSIONS: The novel, evidence-based DETECT algorithm for PAH detection in SSc is a sensitive, non-invasive tool which minimises missed diagnoses, identifies milder disease and addresses resource usage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203301

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 832

Metadata

Authors
Coghlan, J. G., Denton, C. P., Grünig, E., Bonderman, D., Distler, O., Khanna, D., Müller-Ladner, U., Pope, J. E., Vonk, M. C., Doelberg, M., Chadha-Boreham, H., Heinzl, H., Rosenberg, D. M., McLaughlin, V. V., & Seibold, J. R.
Venue
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
73
Issue
7
Pages
1340-1349
ISSN
0003-4967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100422140
Cited by
832
References
1
FWCI
43.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence-based detection of pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis: the DETECT study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203301
The paper
Coghlan, J. G., Denton, C. P., Grünig, E., Bonderman, D., Distler, O., Khanna, D., Müller-Ladner, U., Pope, J. E., Vonk, M. C., Doelberg, M., Chadha-Boreham, H., Heinzl, H., Rosenberg, D. M., McLaughlin, V. V., & Seibold, J. R. (2014). Evidence-based detection of pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis: the DETECT study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203301

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.