Cited by 68Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchSystemic Sclerosis and Related DiseasesVasculitis and related conditions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) SLE classification criteria item performance

Open access

Abstract

Background/objectives The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2019 classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus system showed high specificity, while attaining also high sensitivity. We hereby analysed the performance of the individual criteria items and their contribution to the overall performance of the criteria.Methods We combined the EULAR/ACR derivation and validation cohorts for a total of 1197 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and n=1074 non-SLE patients with a variety of conditions mimicking SLE, such as other autoimmune diseases, and calculated the sensitivity and specificity for antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and the 23 specific criteria items. We also tested performance omitting the EULAR/ACR criteria attribution rule, which defines that items are only counted if not more likely explained by a cause other than SLE.Results Positive ANA, the new entry criterion, was 99.5% sensitive, but only 19.4% specific, against a non-SLE population that included other inflammatory rheumatic, infectious, malignant and metabolic diseases. The specific criteria items were highly variable in sensitivity (from 0.42% for delirium and 1.84% for psychosis to 75.6% for antibodies to double-stranded DNA), but their specificity was uniformly high, with low C3 or C4 (83.0%) and leucopenia <4.000/mm³ (83.8%) at the lowest end. Unexplained fever was 95.3% specific in this cohort. Applying the attribution rule improved specificity, particularly for joint involvement.Conclusions Changing the position of the highly sensitive, non-specific ANA to an entry criterion and the attribution rule resulted in a specificity of >80% for all items, explaining the higher overall specificity of the criteria set.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219373

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Radin, 2020, Impact of the new 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus in a multicenter cohort study of 133 women with undifferentiated connective tissue disease, Arthritis Care Res

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Aringer, M., Brinks, R., Dörner, T., Daikh, D., Mosca, M., Ramsey-Goldman, R., Smolen, J. S., Wofsy, D., Boumpas, D. T., Kamen, D. L., Jayne, D., Cervera, R., Costedoat-Chalumeau, N., Diamond, B., Gladman, D. D., Hahn, B., Hiepe, F., Jacobsen, S., Khanna, D., Lerstrøm, K., Massarotti, E., McCune, J., Ruiz-Irastorza, G., Sanchez-Guerrero, J., Schneider, M., Urowitz, M., Bertsias, G., Hoyer, B. F., Leuchten, N., Schmajuk, G., Tani, C., Tedeschi, S. K., Touma, Z., Anic, B., Assan, F., Chan, T. M., Clarke, A. E., Crow, M. K., Czirják, L., Doria, A., Graninger, W., Halda-Kiss, B., Hasni, S., Izmirly, P. M., Jung, M., Kumánovics, G., Mariette, X., Padjen, I., Pego-Reigosa, J. M., Romero-Diaz, J., Rúa-Figueroa, Í., Seror, R., Stummvoll, G. H., Tanaka, Y., Tektonidou, M. G., Vasconcelos, C., Vital, E. M., Wallace, D. J., Yavuz, S., Meroni, P. L., Fritzler, M. J., Naden, R., Costenbader, K., & Johnson, S. R.
Affiliations
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • Portland VA Medical Center (US)
  • University of Pisa (IT)
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
  • Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR)
  • Feinstein Institute for Medical Research (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Rigshospitalet (DK)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • LUPUS UK (GB)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • University of Crete (GR)
  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
  • San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
  • Université Paris-Sud (FR)
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • Hospital for Special Surgery (US)
  • University of Pecs (HU)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Medical University of Graz (AT)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • University Hospital Centre Zagreb (HR)
  • University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan (JP)
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
  • IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (IT)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Aringer, Martin
Venue
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-06
Volume
80
Issue
6
Pages
775-781
ISSN
0003-4967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3128254628
Cited by
68
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10
FWCI
9.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
  • Istanbul Science University (Istanbul Bilim University) (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (CS-2013-13-032, RTF/01/097, CL-2012-02-003)
  • Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS-SGCL8-Vital)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Medical Research Council (MR/M01665X/1)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (ZIAAR041232)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Vasculitis and related conditions
Keywords
systemic lupus erythematosus, sensitivity and specificity, antinuclear antibodies, anti-dsDNA antibodies, complement C3 and C4, leukopenia, fever of unknown origin, joint involvement
MeSH terms
Antibodies, Antinuclear, Humans, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Rheumatic Diseases, Rheumatology, Sensitivity and Specificity, United States, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review