Cited by 50Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research

NT-proBNP predicts mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from 10-year follow-up of the EURIDISS study

Provan, Sella, Angel, Kristin, Semb, Anne Grete, Atar, Dan, Kvien, Tore K·2010·Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Abstract

Objectives Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have a higher mortality than the general population, and this increased mortality is related to demographic and disease variables. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is a predictor of mortality both in general and patient populations, but has not been shown to predict mortality in patients with RA. This study examines whether NT-proBNP can further improve the prediction of mortality in RA.Methods 182 patients with RA of 5-9 years disease duration were comprehensively examined in 1997. Serum samples were frozen and later batch analysed for NT-proBNP levels and other biomarkers. Adjusted univariate and logistic regression analyses were performed with death within the 10-year follow-up period as the dependent variable. Significant predictors were also examined as dichotomised variables.Results Mortality was predicted in univariate analyses by the following variables: age, sex, homozygosity for HLA-DRB1 shared epitope alleles, Health Assessment Questionnaire, 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) and NT-proBNP. A multivariate model with age, sex, DAS28 and NT-proBNP as independent variables showed the greatest discrimination.Conclusion NT-proBNP provided incremental information in the prediction of mortality in this cohort of patients with RA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/ard.2009.127704

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In chronic inflammatory diseases, serum levels of atrial natriuretic factor and NT-brain natriuretic factor are markedly increased, indicating volume overload.

    “there are obvious signs of volume overload in chronic inflammatory diseases because serum levels of atrial natriuretic factor and NT-brain natriuretic factor are markedly increased in different diseases [49–52].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Provan, S., Angel, K., Semb, A. G., Atar, D., & Kvien, T. K.
Affiliations
  • Diakonhjemmet Hospital (NO)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
Corresponding author
Provan, Sella
Venue
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-11
Volume
69
Issue
11
Pages
1946-1950
ISSN
0003-4967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133846358
Cited by
50
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
Keywords
rheumatoid arthritis, NT-proBNP, mortality prediction, cardiovascular risk, biomarkers, HLA-DRB1 shared epitope, DAS28, prognostic factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Norway, Peptide Fragments, Prognosis, Sex Factors, Biomarkers, Natriuretic Peptide, Brain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review