Cited by 19Maternal and fetal healthcarePregnancy and preeclampsia studiesBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms

Placental abruption leading to hysterectomy

Open access
Sylvester, Hannah Catherine, Stringer, Madeleine·2017·BMJ Case Reports

Abstract

A 32-year-old multigravid patient at 21 weeks gestation presents with major concealed placental abruption and subsequent fetal demise. During an eventually failed misoprostol regime aiming for vaginal delivery she develops severe disseminated intravascular coagulopathy. Subsequent hysterotomy reveals Couvelaire uterus with major haemorrhage and requires subtotal hysterectomy for haemostasis. This case highlights the severity of the systemic response to abruption and fetal demise in utero and the multifactorial nature of its management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bcr-2016-218349

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [1]Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Guideline No. 55: late intrauterine fetal death and stillbirth 2010. London: RCOG, 2010. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg55/ [Google Scholar]
  2. [8]Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Guideline No. 63: antepartum haemorrhage 2011. London: RCOG, 2011. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg63/ [Google Scholar]
  3. [9]Klearhou N, Daniilidis A, Stergiopoulos K, et al. Placental abruption and severe disseminated intravascular coagulopathy. Hippokratia 2005;9:130–1. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sylvester, H. C., & Stringer, M.
Affiliations
King Edward Memorial Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Sylvester, Hannah Catherine
Venue
BMJ Case Reports
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2017-12-11
Volume
2017
Pages
bcr2016218349
ISSN
1757-790X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2775827997
Cited by
19
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Case Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Keywords
placental abruption, hysterectomy, hysterotomy, disseminated intravascular coagulation, Couvelaire uterus, uterine bleeding, intrauterine fetal death, misoprostol, third trimester
MeSH terms
Abortifacient Agents, Abruptio Placentae, Adult, Diagnosis, Differential, Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation, Female, Fetal Death, Humans, Hysterectomy, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Misoprostol

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review