Cited by 2Musculoskeletal synovial abnormalities and treatmentsClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsMusculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation

Avoiding Anchoring Bias in Unexplained Chronic Pain: An Unexpected Diagnosis of Synovial Osteochondromatosis

Open access
Murani, Rehana, Manocha, Ranita Harpreet Kaur·2021·BMJ Case Reports

Abstract

Unconscious biases may influence clinical decision making, leading to diagnostic error. Anchoring bias occurs when a physician relies too heavily on the initial data received. We present a 57-year-old man with a 3-year history of unexplained right thigh pain who was referred to a physiatry clinic for suggestions on managing presumed non-organic pain. The patient had previously been assessed by numerous specialists and had undergone several imaging investigations, with no identifiable cause for his pain. Physical examination was challenging and there were several ‘yellow flags’ on history. A thorough reconsideration of the possible diagnoses led to the discovery of hip synovial osteochondromatosis as the cause for his symptoms. Over-reliance on the referral information may have led to this diagnosis being missed. In patients with unexplained pain, it is important to be aware of anchoring bias in order to avoid missing rare diagnoses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bcr-2020-240462

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Information such as pre-existing notes from prior consultants, normal imaging results, and the presence of yellow flags directs clinicians to focus on their original diagnostic hypothesis without further questioning secondary or alternative possibilities.

    “Information such as pre-existing notes from prior consultants, normal imaging results, and the presence of yellow flags directs clinicians to focus on their original diagnostic hypothesis without further questioning secondary or alternative possibilities [99].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murani, R., & Manocha, R. H. K.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Manocha, Ranita Harpreet Kaur
Venue
BMJ Case Reports
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2021-04
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
e240462
ISSN
1757-790X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3143575090
Cited by
2
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Case Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Musculoskeletal synovial abnormalities and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
Keywords
anchoring effect, diagnostic errors, synovial chondromatosis, hip pain, referral bias, missed diagnosis, rare diagnosis, rehabilitation medicine
MeSH terms
Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physical Examination, Thigh, Chondromatosis, Synovial, Bias, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review