The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Incidence of keratitis of varying severity among contact lens wearers
Open accessAbstract
AIM: To determine the incidence of non-severe keratitis (NSK) and severe keratitis (SK) among wearers of current generation contact lenses. METHODS: A 12 month, prospective, hospital based epidemiological study was conducted by examining all contact lens wearers presenting with a corneal infiltrate/ulcer to a hospital centre in Manchester. A clinical severity matrix was used to differentiate between NSK and SK, based on the severity of signs and symptoms. The size of the hospital catchment population and the wearing modalities (daily wear (DW) or extended wear (EW)) and lens types being used were estimated from relevant demographic and market data. RESULTS: During the survey period, 80 and 38 patients presented with NSK and SK, respectively. The annual incidences (cases per 10,000 wearers) for each wearing modality and lens type were: DW rigid--NSK 5.7, SK 2.9; DW hydrogel daily disposable--NSK 9.1, SK 4.9; DW hydrogel (excluding daily disposable)--NSK 14.1, SK 6.4; DW silicone hydrogel--NSK 55.9, SK 0.0; EW rigid--NSK 0.0, SK 0.0; EW hydrogel--NSK 48.2, SK 96.4; EW silicone hydrogel--NSK 98.8, SK 19.8. The difference in SK between EW hydrogel and EW silicone hydrogel was significant (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: A clinical severity matrix has considerable utility in assessing contact lens related keratitis. There is a significantly higher incidence of SK in wearers who sleep in contact lenses compared with those who only use lenses during the waking hours. Those who choose to sleep in lenses should be advised to wear silicone hydrogel lenses, which carry a five times decreased risk of SK for extended wear compared with hydrogel lenses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Incidence of contact-lens-associated microbial keratitis and its related morbidity
Cheng, K. H., Leung, S. L., Hoekman, H. W., Beekhuis, W. H., Mulder, P. G., Geerards, A. J., & Kijlstra, A. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)09385-4 · Cited by 611
Poggio, E. C., Glynn, R. J., Schein, O. D., Seddon, J. M., Shannon, M. J., Scardino, V. A., & Kenyon, K. R. (1989) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198909213211202 · Cited by 572
Schein, O. D., Glynn, R. J., Poggio, E. C., Seddon, J. M., Kenyon, K. R., & The Microbial Keratitis Study Group (1989) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198909213211201 · Cited by 523
The Impact of Overnight Wear on the Risk of Contact Lens—Associated Ulcerative Keratitis
Schein, O. D., Buehler, P. O., Stamler, J. F., Verdier, D. D., & Katz, J. (1994) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.1994.01090140062024 · Cited by 135
The pathogenesis of bacterial keratitis: studies with Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Fleiszig, S. M. J., & Evans, D. J. (2002) · Clinical and Experimental Optometry · doi:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2002.tb03082.x · Cited by 128
Cited by
The Incidence of Contact Lens–Related Microbial Keratitis in Australia
Stapleton, F., Keay, L., Edwards, K., Naduvilath, T., Dart, J. K. G., Brian, G., & Holden, B. A. (2008) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.04.002 · Cited by 666
Global contact lens prescribing 2000-2020
Morgan, P. B., & Efron, N. (2022) · Clinical and Experimental Optometry · doi:10.1080/08164622.2022.2033604 · Cited by 102
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Morgan, P. B.
- Venue
- British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2005-04-01
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 430-436
- ISSN
- 0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1571821891
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 22.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence of keratitis of varying severity among contact lens wearers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjo.2004.052688
- The paper
- Morgan, P. B. (2005). Incidence of keratitis of varying severity among contact lens wearers. British Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2004.052688
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.