The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Relative Risk of Ulcerative Keratitis among Users of Daily-Wear and Extended-Wear Soft Contact Lenses
Abstract
Over 13 million people in the United States wear soft contact lenses for refractive correction. Ulcerative keratitis is considered the most serious adverse effect of the use of contact lenses. We performed a case-control study with 86 cases patients, estimating separately for hospital-based (n = 61) and population-based (n = 410) controls the relative risk of ulcerative keratitis among users of extended-wear as compared with daily-wear soft contact lenses. The relative risk of ulcerative keratitis for extended-wear as compared with daily-wear lenses among the population-based controls was 3.90 (95 percent confidence interval, 2.35 to 6.48) and among the hospital-based controls, 4.21 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.95 to 9.08). Thirty-eight percent of those with extended-wear lenses used them only during the day, and 11 percent of those with daily-wear lenses occasionally wore them overnight. When lens wearers were distinguished according to their overnight use of lenses, the users of extended-wear lenses who wore them overnight had a risk 10 to 15 times as great as the users of daily-wear lenses who did not, and the users of daily-wear lenses who sometimes wore them overnight had 9 times the risk of the users of such lenses who did not. For the users of extended-wear lenses, the risk of ulcerative keratitis was incrementally related to the extent of overnight wear. A reduction in risk associated with more frequent attention to lens hygiene was almost significant. We conclude that soft contact lenses worn overnight carry a significantly greater risk for ulcerative keratitis than soft lenses worn only during the day.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Multistate Outbreak of Fusarium Keratitis Associated With Use of a Contact Lens Solution
Chang, D. C., Grant, G. B., O’Donnell, K., Wannemuehler, K. A., Noble-Wang, J., Rao, C. Y., Jacobson, L. M., Crowell, C. S., Sneed, R. S., Lewis, F. M. T., et al. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.8.953 · Cited by 600
Incidence of Ulcerative Keratitis in a Defined Population From 1950 Through 1988
Erie, J. C. (1993) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.1993.01090120087027 · Cited by 268
Incidence of keratitis of varying severity among contact lens wearers
Morgan, P. B. (2005) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.2004.052688 · Cited by 269
Peng, C.-C., Kim, J., & Chauhan, A. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.113 · Cited by 263
Pseudomonas aeruginosa and microbial keratitis
Hilliam, Y., Kaye, S., & Winstanley, C. (2020) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/jmm.0.001110 · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Authors
- Schein, O. D., Glynn, R. J., Poggio, E. C., Seddon, J. M., Kenyon, K. R., & The Microbial Keratitis Study Group
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1989-09-21
- Volume
- 321
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 773-778
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2340219649
- Cited by
- 523
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Relative Risk of Ulcerative Keratitis among Users of Daily-Wear and Extended-Wear Soft Contact Lenses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198909213211201
- The paper
- Schein, O. D., Glynn, R. J., Poggio, E. C., Seddon, J. M., Kenyon, K. R., & The Microbial Keratitis Study Group. (1989). The Relative Risk of Ulcerative Keratitis among Users of Daily-Wear and Extended-Wear Soft Contact Lenses. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198909213211201
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.