Cited by 80Organ Donation and TransplantationCorneal surgery and disordersNonprofit Sector and Volunteering

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Knowledge and beliefs on corneal donation in Singapore adults

Open access
Yew, Y-W·2005·British Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract

AIM: To assess the knowledge and willingness of Singapore adults towards corneal donation. METHODS: The study population consists of a cluster random sample of the population living in Bedok North (an area in the eastern part of Singapore). The study population comprised residents aged 21-65 years living in 675 randomly sampled housing units. The participation rate was 65.9% (544/825). All participants were interviewed face to face with a questionnaire formulated according to the modified Horton and Horton model. Knowledge, values, attitudes, and spiritual beliefs of participants were assessed to evaluate their willingness to donate their corneas. RESULTS: 67.0% of participants were willing to donate their corneas. Ethnicity (Chinese) and religion (Christians, Hindus, or those with no religion) were associated with increased willingness to donate corneas. Greater knowledge and increased altruistic values were also associated with increased willingness to donate corneas. CONCLUSION: A proportion of participants were willing to donate their corneas. Awareness of corneal donation is high but specific knowledge should be further increased among adults.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjo.2004.057372

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 20 best studies on R/S and altruism, 15 (75%) reported positive relationships and two (10%) found negative associations.

    “of the 20 best studies, 15 (75%) reported positive relationships [108–113] and two (10%) found negative associations [114, 115] (both concerning organ donations, which some religions prohibit).”

    From Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications (2012) · cites this paper as [110]

    Table 8 (labeled CONCLUSION; page unavailable) reports that respondents who considered being religious important were less willing to donate corneas, supporting this paper as an example of a negative association. The Discussion suggests that reluctance to donate could reflect religious or cultural reasons, but does not establish that a religion prohibits donation. The paper does not supply the citing review’s count of two negative studies. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Duggal M, Brar GS, Prasad VS, et al. Public attitude toward eye donation in NW India. Transplant Proc 2003;35:19-20.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yew, Y.-W.
Affiliations
National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Yew, Y-W
Venue
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2005-07-01
Volume
89
Issue
7
Pages
835-840
ISSN
0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031890686
Cited by
80
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National University of Singapore
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Organ Donation and Transplantation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Keywords
corneal donation, corneal transplantation, willingness to donate, public knowledge, altruism, religious beliefs, ethnicity, attitudes toward organ donation, Singapore adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Altruism, Awareness, China, Cornea, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Population Surveillance, Religion and Medicine, Religion and Psychology, Singapore, Tissue Donors, Corneal Transplantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review