Long-term efficacy and safety of bimatoprost for intraocular pressure lowering in glaucoma and ocular hypertension: year 4
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bimatoprost 0.03% has been shown to consistently reduce mean intraocular pressure (IOP) more than timolol 0.5% over 2 years. To further evaluate long-term safety and efficacy, once-daily bimatoprost 0.03% was compared with timolol 0.5% twice daily through year 4. METHODS: In this multicentre, double-masked, randomised, controlled trial, glaucoma and ocular hypertension patients (n = 152) who completed phase III bimatoprost trials through month 36 were enrolled in a study extension through month 48. Patients randomised to bimatoprost once daily (n = 78) or timolol twice daily (n = 35) continued on the same regimen for a fourth year. Patients randomised to bimatoprost twice daily had been switched to bimatoprost once daily dosing at month 24 (bimatoprost twice daily/once daily treatment group), and continued with once daily dosing through month 48 (n = 39). IOP was measured at 08:00 and 10:00 at months 39, 42, 45 and 48. Safety measures included adverse events, biomicroscopy, ophthalmoscopy, visual acuity and visual field. RESULTS: Baseline IOP was comparable among groups. During year 4, mean IOP reductions from baseline were 7.0 to 8.1 mm Hg with bimatoprost once daily and 6.5 to 7.9 mm Hg with bimatoprost twice daily/once daily, significantly greater than with timolol twice daily (3.8 to 5.8 mm Hg, p< or =0.035) at all measurements. Over 4 years, the mean IOP reduction from baseline at 08:00 and 10:00 was 1.9 to 3.9 mm Hg (35% to 100%) greater with bimatoprost once daily than with timolol (p< or =0.013). Low IOPs were achieved by more bimatoprost than timolol patients (p< or =0.042). No safety concerns developed during long-term bimatoprost treatment; two patients in the timolol treatment group discontinued after month 36 because of adverse events. The most common treatment-related adverse event in the bimatoprost treatment groups was conjunctival hyperaemia. CONCLUSION: Bimatoprost once daily provided sustained IOP lowering greater than timolol twice daily and was well tolerated over long-term use.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The safety profile of bimatoprost 0.03% has been well established for treatment of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
“The safety profile of bimatoprost 0.03 % has been well established for treatment of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension [11, 20].”
From Bimatoprost for Eyelash Growth in Japanese Subjects: Two Multicenter Controlled Studies (2014) · cites this paper as [11]
The long-term safety of bimatoprost 0.03% for glaucoma and ocular hypertension has been established.
“As noted earlier, the long-term safety of bimatoprost 0.03 % for glaucoma and ocular hypertension has been established.”
From Bimatoprost for Eyelash Growth in Japanese Subjects: Two Multicenter Controlled Studies (2014) · cites this paper as [11]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Management of hypotrichosis of the eyelashes: Focus on bimatoprost
Fagien, S. (2010) · Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology · doi:10.2147/ccid.s5488 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Bimatoprost for Eyelash Growth in Japanese Subjects: Two Multicenter Controlled Studies
Harii, K., Arase, S., Tsuboi, R., Weng, E., Daniels, S., & VanDenburgh, A. (2014) · Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00266-014-0293-7 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Williams, R. D., Cohen, J. S., Gross, R. L., Liu, C.-C., Safyan, E., Batoosingh, A. L., & for the Bimatoprost Study Group
- Affiliations
- Taustine Eye Center (US)
- Cincinnati Eye Institute (US)
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Williams, R D
- Venue
- British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2008-07-11
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1387-1392
- ISSN
- 0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002127297
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 5.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Keywords
- glaucoma, ocular hypertension, intraocular pressure reduction, long-term efficacy, long-term safety, once-daily dosing, timolol, adverse events, visual field, visual acuity, biomicroscopy, fundus examination, beta-blockers, prostamide analogues, glaucoma progression, intraocular pressure variability
- MeSH terms
- Bimatoprost, Amides, Analysis of Variance, Cloprostenol, Conjunctival Diseases, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Glaucoma, Humans, Intraocular Pressure, Male, Middle Aged, Ocular Hypertension, Timolol, Visual Acuity, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review