Survey of the contamination of eyedrops of hospital inpatients and recommendations for the changing of current practice in eyedrop dispensing
Open accessAbstract
Topical ophthalmic medications used on the ward and from the outpatient area have been taken and cultured for potential bacterial contamination in the laboratory. We examined 143 bottles used by patients who had had routine cataract surgery and trabeculectomy. We also examined for bacterial contamination 216 bottles of eyedrops used in the outpatient area of the hospital. No contamination was found in the postoperative eyedrops, but five bottles were contaminated from the outpatient area (2.3%). The bacterial growth from outpatient drops was of the same order of magnitude as in previous studies. The practice in the UK for postoperative eyedrops to be discarded and fresh, separate bottles to take home is discussed. We recommend that this practice be changed so that the postoperative drops used for 72 hours or less are taken home.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Allowing patients to use topical medications after discharge, rather than discarding unused medication, can address some drug waste issues.
“Allowing patients to use topical medications after discharge, rather than discarding the unused medication, can address some drug waste issues.79”
From How Ophthalmologists Can Decarbonize Eye Care (2023) · cites this paper as [79]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Microbial Keratitis Associated with Contaminated Ocular Medications
Wasson, P. J., Boruchoff, S. A., Schein, O. D., et al. (1988) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/0002-9394(88)90298-x · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Serratia Keratitis Transmitted by Contaminated Eyedroppers
Templeton, W. C., Eiferman, R. A., Snyder, J. W., et al. (1982) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/0002-9394(82)90467-6 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
BACTERIAL CONTAMINATION OF DROPS AND DROPPER TIPS OF IN‐USE MULTIDOSE EYE DROP BOTTLES
Høvding, G., & Sjursen, H. (1982) · Acta Ophthalmologica · doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.1982.tb08375.x · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Bacterial Contamination of Eyedrop Dispensers
Coad, C. T., Osato, M. S., & Wilhelmus, K. R. (1984) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/0002-9394(84)90238-1 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Studies on in-use microbial contamination of eye drops.
Aslund, B., Olson, O. T., & Sandell, E. (1978) · PubMed · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Prolonged Antibacterial Activity of a Fluorescein-Anesthetic Solution
Stewart, H. L. (1972) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.1972.01000030387006 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
A NOTE ON THE CONTAMINATION OF EYE-DROPS FOLLOWING USE BY HOSPITAL OUT-PATIENTS
Ford, J. L., Brown, M. W., & Hunt, P. B. (1985) · Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2710.1985.tb01134.x · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Fluress, fluorescein and benoxinate: recovery from bacterial contamination.
Yolton, D. P., & German, C. (1980) · PubMed · Cited by 7 · see citing works
INVESTIGATION OF THE LEVELS OF BACTERIAL CONTAMINATION IN USED EYE DROPS
Bois, S. K. D., Pinney, R. J., & DAVISON, A. L. (1989) · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Contamination of dropper bottles with tear fluid in an ophthalmic outpatient clinic.
Aylward, G. W., & Wilson, R. S. (1987) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.294.6587.1587 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
SURVEY OF IN-USE CONTAMINATION OF EYE DROPS
Hugo, W. B., & Wilson, J. V. (1970) · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Olszewski, Z., Michalewska, J., Krutul, H., et al. (1976) · PubMed · Cited by 1 · see citing works
More on contamination of solutions.
Dj, M. (1984) · PubMed · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- [7]7. Marion AD, Tapert MJ. Bacterial contamination of timolol in use by a non-selected clinic population. ARVO Abstracts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci supplement. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1986: 36.
- [9]9. Hugo WB, Wilson JV. In-use contamination of eye-drops. PharmJ 1970; 204: 714.
- [16]16. Preservation of eye-drops. (Editorial.) Pharm J 1964; 192: 587-8.
- [17]17. Stewart HL. Prolonged antibacterial activity of fluorescein- anaesthetic solution. Arch Ophthalmol 1972; 88: 385-7.
- [19]19. Davison AL, Hooper WL, Spooner DF, Farwell JA, Baird R. The validity of the criteria of pharmacopoeial preservative efficacy tests -a pilot study. PharmJf 1991; 246: 555-7.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How Ophthalmologists Can Decarbonize Eye Care
Sherry, B., Lee, S., Ramos Cadena, M. D. L. A., Laynor, G., Patel, S. R., Simon, M. D., Romanowski, E. G., Hochman, S. E., Schuman, J. S., Prescott, C., et al. (2023) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.02.028 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Tsegaw, A., Tsegaw, A., Abula, T., & Assefa, Y. (2017) · Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.4103/meajo.meajo_308_16 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Contamination of multi dose eyedrops in the intra and perioperative context
Daehn, T., Schneider, A., Knobloch, J., Hellwinkel, O. J. C., Spitzer, M. S., & Kromer, R. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-99892-8 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Virani, S., Rewri, P., & Vyas, A. (2016) · Delhi Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.7869/djo.164 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stevens, J. D., & Matheson, M. M.
- Affiliations
- Moorfields Eye Hospital (GB)
- Venue
- British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1992-01-01
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 36-38
- ISSN
- 0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC504146
- OpenAlex
- W2164305364
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 0.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- British Journal of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Infections and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection
- Keywords
- bacterial contamination, hospitalized patients, cataract surgery, trabeculectomy
- MeSH terms
- Cataract Extraction, Drug Contamination, Hospitalization, Humans, Length of Stay, Ophthalmic Solutions, Outpatient Clinics, Hospital, Postoperative Care, Time Factors, Trabeculectomy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review