Diurnal intraocular pressure variations: an analysis of 690 diurnal curves.
Open accessAbstract
Out of a total of 2272 diurnal curves (DC) of intraocular pressure (IOP) obtained from 1178 patients 690 first curves of the right eye of all patients were analysed. For each DC there were 4-6 IOP readings taken between 8 am and 6.30 pm of the same day. The patients' diagnosis, age, sex, type of IOP lowering medication, diabetes, and the calendar month of the year were recorded. In 40% of cases the highest IOP was found at the earliest morning measurement with some 65% of peaks occurring before noon. The lowest IOP measurement showed no specific predilection for any particular time of the day. These findings were true for all diagnosis groups. The mean range of IOP fluctuation during the DC was 5.0 mm Hg in normals, 5.8 mm Hg in patients with open angle glaucoma (OAG), and 6.8 mm Hg in patients with ocular hypertension (OHT). Patients treated with timolol had a lower mean IOP fluctuation range than those on other types of IOP lowering treatment. No association was found between all other parameters examined and the diurnal IOP distribution.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The normal range for intraocular pressure is reportedly 7-21 mmHg, and daily fluctuations in intraocular pressure can show an approximate range of 3-7 mmHg.
“The normal range for IOPs is reportedly 7–21 mmHg, and daily fluctuations in IOP can show an approximate range of 3–7 mmHg [22–25].”
From Bimatoprost for Eyelash Growth in Japanese Subjects: Two Multicenter Controlled Studies (2014) · cites this paper as [24]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
11β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase: unexpected connections
Walker, E. A., & Stewart, P. M. (2003) · Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/s1043-2760(03)00134-6 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Bimatoprost for Eyelash Growth in Japanese Subjects: Two Multicenter Controlled Studies
Harii, K., Arase, S., Tsuboi, R., Weng, E., Daniels, S., & VanDenburgh, A. (2014) · Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00266-014-0293-7 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- David, R., Zangwill, L., Briscoe, D., Dagan, M., Yagev, R., & Yassur, Y.
- Affiliations
- Soroka Medical Center (IL)
- Venue
- British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1992-05-01
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 280-283
- ISSN
- 0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC504256
- OpenAlex
- W2168563911
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- British Journal of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal surgery and disorders
- Keywords
- intraocular pressure, diurnal variation, circadian rhythm, open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension, timolol, IOP-lowering medications
- MeSH terms
- Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Aged, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Glaucoma, Open-Angle, Humans, Intraocular Pressure, Male, Middle Aged, Ocular Hypertension, Seasons
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review