The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is the incidence of registrable age-related macular degeneration increasing?
Open accessAbstract
AIMS/BACKGROUND: Age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) is a growing public health problem in Britain; currently its aetiology is unclear. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the age specific incidence of blinding ARMD has increased in Britain in the past 50 years, using data on cause of visual loss in people registered as blind, published every 10 years since 1950. METHODS: Data were abstracted from published sources for the years 1950, 1960, 1970, and 1980. Data for the standard year, 1990, were provided in a database from the Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. The numbers of new registrations attributed to ARMD per head of population were compared with registrations for cataract, glaucoma, and optic atrophy. Indirect standardisation was used to control for changes in the age structure of the population over time. RESULTS: After controlling for changes in the age structure of the population, registration rates for all causes, cataract, glaucoma, and optic atrophy have decreased while registrations attributed to ARMD have increased in the order of 30-40%. CONCLUSIONS: These findings are compatible with the hypothesis that the incidence of ARMD is increasing in Britain. It is difficult to exclude potential sources of bias in these data, however, particularly with respect to classification and coding of cause; more reliable population based data on ARMD in Britain are needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Risk factors for neovascular age-related macular degeneration
(1992) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.1992.01080240041025 · Cited by 486
Cited by
Current concepts in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration
Zarbin, M. A. (2004) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.122.4.598 · Cited by 1,006
Richer, S., Stiles, W., Statkute, L., Pulido, J., Frankowski, J., Rudy, D., Pei, K., Tsipursky, M., & Nyland, J. (2004) · Optometry - Journal of the American Optometric Association · doi:10.1016/s1529-1839(04)70049-4 · Cited by 566
Stone, E. M., Lotery, A. J., Munier, F. L., Héon, E., Piguet, B., Guymer, R. H., Vandenburgh, K., Cousin, P., Nishimura, D., Swiderski, R. E., et al. (1999) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/9722 · Cited by 493
Khan, J. C. (2006) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.073643 · Cited by 390
Drusen in Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Abdelsalam, A., Del Priore, L., & Zarbin, M. A. (1999) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0039-6257(99)00072-7 · Cited by 352
Metadata
- Authors
- Evans, J., & Wormald, R.
- Venue
- British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-14
- ISSN
- 0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049799939
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is the incidence of registrable age-related macular degeneration increasing? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjo.80.1.9
- The paper
- Evans, J., & Wormald, R. (1996). Is the incidence of registrable age-related macular degeneration increasing? British Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.80.1.9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.