The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detection of gonioscopically occludable angles and primary angle closure glaucoma by estimation of limbal chamber depth in Asians: modified grading scheme
Open accessAbstract
AIM: To evaluate the performance of limbal chamber depth estimation as a means of detecting occludable drainage angles and primary angle closure, with or without glaucoma, in an east Asian population, and determine whether an augmented grading scheme would enhance test performance. METHOD: A two phase, cross sectional, community based study was conducted on rural and urban areas of Hövsgöl and Omnögobi provinces, Mongolia. 1800 subjects aged 40 to 93 years were selected and 1717 (95%) of these were examined. Depth of the anterior chamber at the temporal limbus was graded as a percentage fraction of peripheral corneal thickness. An "occludable" angle was one in which the trabecular meshwork was seen in less than 90 degrees of the angle circumference by gonioscopy. Primary angle closure (PAC) was diagnosed in subjects with an occludable angle and either raised pressure or peripheral anterior synechiae. PAC with glaucoma (PACG) was diagnosed in cases with an occludable angle combined with glaucomatous optic neuropathy and consistent visual morbidity. RESULTS: Occludable angles were identified in 140 subjects, 28 of these had PACG. The 15% grade (equivalent to the traditional "grade 1") yielded sensitivity and specificity of 84% and 86% respectively for the detection of occludable angles. The 5% grade gave sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 93% for the detection of PACG. The interobserver agreement for this augmented grading scheme was good (weighted kappa 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: The traditional limbal chamber depth grading scheme offers good performance for detecting occludable drainage angles in this population. The augmented scheme gives enhanced performance in detection of established PACG. The augmented scheme has potential for good interobserver agreement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistics Notes: Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values
Altman, D. G., & Bland, J. M. (1994) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6947.102 · Cited by 1,711
Cited by
Foster, P. J. (2000) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.118.8.1105 · Cited by 628
Self-citationGlaucoma in China: how big is the problem?
Foster, P. J. (2001) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.85.11.1277 · Cited by 598
Self-citationPrimary Open-Angle Glaucoma Preferred Practice Pattern®
Gedde, S. J., Vinod, K., Wright, M. M., Muir, K. W., Lind, J. T., Chen, P. P., Li, T., & Mansberger, S. L. (2021) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.10.022 · Cited by 474
Epidemiology of glaucoma: what's new?
Cook, C., & Foster, P. (2012) · Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2012.02.003 · Cited by 305
Self-citationThe Prevalence and Types of Glaucoma in Malay People: The Singapore Malay Eye Study
Shen, S. Y., Wong, T. Y., Foster, P. J., Loo, J.-L., Rosman, M., Loon, S.-C., Wong, W. L., Saw, S.-M., & Aung, T. (2008) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.08-1759 · Cited by 279
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Foster, P. J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2000-02-01
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 186-192
- ISSN
- 0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053249034
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of gonioscopically occludable angles and primary angle closure glaucoma by estimation of limbal chamber depth in Asians: modified grading scheme. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjo.84.2.186
- The paper
- Foster, P. J. (2000). Detection of gonioscopically occludable angles and primary angle closure glaucoma by estimation of limbal chamber depth in Asians: modified grading scheme. British Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.84.2.186
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.