The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Atopy and keratoconus: a multivariate analysis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The primary goal of this study was to determine if atopy is a risk factor for keratoconus. Other potential risk factors were also studied and included age, sex, race, eye rubbing, mitral valve prolapse, handedness, collagen vascular disease, ocular trauma, pigmentary retinopathy, Marfan's syndrome, Down's syndrome, and a history of contact lens wear. METHODS: A case-control study was designed (n=120) with incident cases assembled from the years 1985-99. Controls were chosen from the same person-time experience as cases and were picked from a source population with multiple outcomes ensuring that none was knowingly related to any of the potential exposures being studied. Atopy was defined based on the UK working group 1994 definition (at least 4/6 criteria = complete, 3/6 criteria = incomplete, and at least 1/6 criteria = partial). Keratoconus was defined based on clinical criteria and previously published I-S values. Multiple logistic regression was used in the analysis to obtain the odds ratios as the measure of association. RESULTS: In the univariate associations, there was an association between keratoconus and atopy as well as eye rubbing and family history of keratoconus. However, in the multivariate analysis, only eye rubbing was still a significant predictor of keratoconus (odds ratio = 6.31 p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the hypothesis that the most significant cause of keratoconus is eye rubbing. Atopy may contribute to keratoconus but most probably via eye rubbing associated with the itch of atopy. No other variable measured was significantly associated with the aetiology of keratoconus.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
WILLIAMS, H. C., JBURNEY, P. G., HAY, R. J., ARCHER, C. B., SHIPLEY, M. J., AHUNTER, J. J., BINGHAM, E. A., FINLAY, A. Y., PEMBROKE, A. C., CGRAHAM-BROWN, R. A., et al. (1994) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.1994.tb08530.x · Cited by 1,271
Cited by
The Genetic and Environmental Factors for Keratoconus
Gordon-Shaag, A., Millodot, M., Shneor, E., & Liu, Y. (2015) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2015/795738 · Cited by 428
Keratoconus: an inflammatory disorder?
Galvis, V, Sherwin, T., Tello, A., Merayo, J., Barrera, R., & Acera, A. (2015) · Eye · doi:10.1038/eye.2015.63 · Cited by 395
Balasubramanian, S. A., Pye, D. C., & Willcox, M. D. (2013) · Clinical and Experimental Optometry · doi:10.1111/cxo.12038 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Bawazeer, A. M.
- Venue
- British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2000-08-01
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 834-836
- ISSN
- 0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2151269976
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atopy and keratoconus: a multivariate analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjo.84.8.834
- The paper
- Bawazeer, A. M. (2000). Atopy and keratoconus: a multivariate analysis. British Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.84.8.834
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.