The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Myopia in Singapore: taking a public health approach
Open accessAbstract
When a natural or manmade disaster occurs, the first place the wounded are relocated to is the hospital. Disasters generate many types of injuries that may require the use of blood products. Blood Banks need to be prepared for a rapid influx of patients. Because of recent world events, the blood community has established guidelines to assist Blood Banks with creating successful Emergency Operations Procedures. Blood Banks can use these guidelines to create mock scenarios and tabletop exercises to estimate how the blood supply will be affected in the wake of disasters such as pandemics and blood shortages. Retrospective review of past disaster experiences such as earthquakes, airline crashes, and bombings can be used to evaluate what went well and what improvements to the process need to be made. Developing a disaster plan is a multistep process that includes determining the need for blood products, routes of communication, how to mobilize hospital staff, and how to procure more blood products. Once a plan is created, it should be practiced and improved upon, so flaws in the plan can be corrected and the best possible care for patients can be provided. ABBREVIATIONS:CLSI - Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, AABB - organization formerly known as the American Association of Blood Banks, ED - emergency department, EMS - emergency medical service, EOP - emergency operations plan, MRCC - Medical Resource Control Center, MCI - Mass Casualty Incident, TASMC - Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, MAC - Medical Alert Center
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Racial Differences in the Cause-Specific Prevalence of Blindness in East Baltimore
Sommer, A., Tielsch, J. M., Katz, J., Quigley, H. A., Gottsch, J. D., Javitt, J. C., Martone, J. F., Royall, R. M., Witt, K. A., & Ezrine, S. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199111143252004 · Cited by 764
Cited by
McCullough, S. J., O’Donoghue, L., & Saunders, K. J. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146332 · Cited by 147
Population-Based Studies in Ophthalmology
Wong, T. Y., & Hyman, L. (2008) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.07.048 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Seet, B.
- Venue
- British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2001-05-01
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 521-526
- ISSN
- 0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141968080
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Myopia in Singapore: taking a public health approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjo.85.5.521
- The paper
- Seet, B. (2001). Myopia in Singapore: taking a public health approach. British Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.85.5.521
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.