The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new non-contact optical device for ocular biometry
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: A new commercially available device (IOLMaster, Zeiss Instruments) provides high resolution non-contact measurements of axial length (using partial coherent interferometry), anterior chamber depth, and corneal radius (using image analysis). The study evaluates the validity and repeatability of these measurements and compares the findings with those obtained from instrumentation currently used in clinical practice. METHOD: Measurements were taken on 52 subjects (104 eyes) aged 18-40 years with a range of mean spherical refractive error from +7.0 D to -9.50 D. IOLMaster measurements of anterior chamber depth and axial length were compared with A-scan applanation ultrasonography (Storz Omega) and those for corneal radius with a Javal-Schiötz keratometer (Topcon) and an EyeSys corneal videokeratoscope. RESULTS: Axial length: the difference between IOLMaster and ultrasound measures was insignificant (0.02 (SD 0.32) mm, p = 0.47) with no bias across the range sampled (22.40-27.99 mm). Anterior chamber depth: significantly shorter depths than ultrasound were found with the IOLMaster (-0.06 (0.25) mm, p <0.02) with no bias across the range sampled (2.85-4.40 mm). Corneal radius: IOLMaster measurements matched more closely those of the keratometer than those of the videokeratoscope (mean difference -0.03 v -0.06 mm respectively), but were more variable (95% confidence 0.13 v 0.07 mm). The repeatability of all the above IOLMaster biometric measures was found to be of a high order with no significant bias across the measurement ranges sampled. CONCLUSIONS: The validity and repeatability of measurements provided by the IOLMaster will augment future studies in ocular biometry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.10.001 · Cited by 5,220
Thibos, L. N., WHEELER, W., & Horner, D. G. (1997) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1002/j.1538-9235.1997.tb04707.x · Cited by 1,238
Improvements on Littmann's method of determining the size of retinal features by fundus photography
Bennett, A. G., Rudnicka, A. R., & Edgar, D. F. (1994) · Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology · doi:10.1007/bf00175988 · Cited by 693
Fercher, A. F. (1996) · Journal of Biomedical Optics · doi:10.1117/12.231361 · Cited by 534
Peripheral refraction and ocular shape in children.
Mutti, D. O., Sholtz, R. I., Friedman, N. E., & Zadnik, K. (2000) · PubMed · Cited by 278
Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in adults
Mallen, E. A. H., Wolffsohn, J. S., Gilmartin, B., & Tsujimura, S. (2001) · Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics · doi:10.1016/s0275-5408(00)00049-1 · Cited by 217
Measurement of optic disc size: equivalence of methods to correct for ocular magnification
Garway‐Heath, D. F., Rudnicka, A. R., Lowe, T., Foster, P. J., Fitzke, F. W., & Hitchings, R. A. (1998) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.82.6.643 · Cited by 211
Cited by
Brennan, N. A., Toubouti, Y. M., Cheng, X., & Bullimore, M. A. (2021) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100923 · Cited by 355
Myopia Control with Orthokeratology Contact Lenses in Spain: Refractive and Biometric Changes
Santodomingo-Rubido, J., Villa-Collar, C., Gilmartin, B., & Gutiérrez-Ortega, R. (2012) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.11-8005 · Cited by 334
Self-citationA new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients
Buckhurst, P. J., Wolffsohn, J. S., Shah, S., Naroo, S. A., Davies, L. N., & Berrow, E. J. (2009) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.2008.156554 · Cited by 287
Optical coherence tomography – development, principles, applications
Fercher, A. F. (2010) · Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik · doi:10.1016/j.zemedi.2009.11.002 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Santodomingo-Rubido, J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2002-04-01
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 458-462
- ISSN
- 0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2150966546
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 5.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new non-contact optical device for ocular biometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjo.86.4.458
- The paper
- Santodomingo-Rubido, J. (2002). A new non-contact optical device for ocular biometry. British Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.86.4.458
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.