The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: A new commercially available optical low coherence reflectometry device (Lenstar, Haag-Streit or Allegro Biograph, Wavelight) provides high-resolution non-contact measurements of ocular biometry. The study evaluates the validity and repeatability of these measurements compared with current clinical instrumentation. METHOD: Measurements were taken with the LenStar and IOLMaster on 112 patients aged 41-96 years listed for cataract surgery. A subgroup of 21 patients also had A-scan applanation ultrasonography (OcuScan) performed. Intersession repeatability of the LenStar measurements was assessed on 32 patients. RESULTS: LenStar measurements of white-to-white were similar to the IOLMaster (average difference 0.06 (SD 0.03) D; p = 0.305); corneal curvature measurements were similar to the IOLMaster (average difference -0.04 (0.20) D; p = 0.240); anterior chamber depth measurements were significantly longer than the IOLMaster (by 0.10 (0.40) mm) and ultrasound (by 0.32 (0.62) mm; p<0.001); crystalline lens thickness measurements were similar to ultrasound (difference 0.16 (0.83) mm, p = 0.382); axial length measurements were significantly longer than the IOLMaster (by 0.01 (0.02) mm) but shorter than ultrasound (by 0.14 (0.15) mm; p<0.001). The LensStar was unable to take measurements due to dense media opacities in a similar number of patients to the IOLMaster (9-10%). The LenStar biometric measurements were found to be highly repeatable (variability < or = 2% of average value). CONCLUSIONS: Although there were some statistical differences between ocular biometry measurements between the LenStar and current clinical instruments, they were not clinically significant. LenStar measurements were highly repeatable and the instrument easy to use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation
Norrby, S. (2008) · Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.10.031 · Cited by 708
Eye-length measurement by interferometry with partially coherent light
Fercher, A. F., Mengedoht, K., & Werner, W. (1988) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.13.000186 · Cited by 516
A new non-contact optical device for ocular biometry
Santodomingo-Rubido, J. (2002) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.86.4.458 · Cited by 294
Lam, A. K. C., Chan, R., & Pang, P. C. K. (2001) · Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics · doi:10.1046/j.1475-1313.2001.00611.x · Cited by 147
Cited by
Brennan, N. A., Toubouti, Y. M., Cheng, X., & Bullimore, M. A. (2021) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100923 · Cited by 355
Axial length growth and the risk of developing myopia in European children
Tideman, J. W. L., Polling, J. R., Vingerling, J. R., Jaddoe, V. W. V., Williams, C., Guggenheim, J. A., & Klaver, C. C. W. (2018) · Acta Ophthalmologica · doi:10.1111/aos.13603 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Buckhurst, P. J., Wolffsohn, J. S., Shah, S., Naroo, S. A., Davies, L. N., & Berrow, E. J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2009-04-19
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 949-953
- ISSN
- 0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148545040
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 20.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjo.2008.156554
- The paper
- Buckhurst, P. J., Wolffsohn, J. S., Shah, S., Naroo, S. A., Davies, L. N., & Berrow, E. J. (2009). A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients. British Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2008.156554
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.