The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Retinal thickness decreases with age: an OCT study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND/AIM: In three dimensional optic disc tomography a reference plane is required to calculate optic disc rim or cup values. The position of the reference plane often depends on the retinal thickness at the temporal disc margin. Originally it was assumed that the retinal thickness at the temporal disc margin is independent of age. The aim of the study was to check this hypothesis using optical coherence tomography, and additionally to determine the reproducibility of OCT measurements in this area. METHODS: 100 eyes of 100 healthy volunteers were included in this study. Three OCT scans were performed on each eye. The scans were aligned vertically and placed at the temporal edge of the optic disc. For each eye, the thickness of the whole retina as well as the thickness of the retinal nerve fibre layer were calculated together with their coefficients of variation. Thereafter retinal thickness and nerve fibre layer thickness were correlated with age. RESULTS: The mean retinal thickness was 249 (SD 22) micro m. The mean nerve fibre layer thickness was 109 (22) micro m. The mean coefficients of variation were 3.5% (total retinal thickness) and 8.0% (nerve fibre layer thickness). Both the total retinal thickness and the nerve fibre layer thickness were significantly correlated with age (total retina: y = 269.5 - 0.53 x x; R(2) = 0.133; p = 0.0002, nerve fibre layer: y = 126.8 - 0.44 x x; R(2) = 0.094; p<0.0019. CONCLUSIONS: Using OCT scans the total retinal thickness can be calculated with high reproducibility (coefficient of variation = 3.5%). The reproducibility of nerve fibre layer thickness measurements is clearly lower (coefficient of variation = 8.0%). Both the total retinal thickness and the nerve fibre layer thickness significantly decrease with age. This influence of the age related decrease in RNFL/retinal thickness on the reference plane, however, is negligible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mwanza, J.-C., Durbin, M. K., Budenz, D. L., Girkin, C. A., Leung, C. K., Liebmann, J. M., Peace, J. H., Werner, J. S., & Wollstein, G. (2011) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.11-7896 · Cited by 275
Akasaka, H., Nakagami, H., Sugimoto, K., Yasunobe, Y., Minami, T., Fujimoto, T., Yamamoto, K., Hara, C., Shiraki, A., Nishida, K., et al. (2023) · Geriatrics & Gerontology International · doi:10.1111/ggi.14513 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Alamouti, B.
- Venue
- British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2003-07-01
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 899-901
- ISSN
- 0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977286054
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Retinal thickness decreases with age: an OCT study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjo.87.7.899
- The paper
- Alamouti, B. (2003). Retinal thickness decreases with age: an OCT study. British Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.87.7.899
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.