Residual corneal stroma in big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: a histological study in eye-bank corneas
Abstract
Aim To determine if residual corneal stroma remains on the recipient posterior lamella in big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK). Methods Pneumodissection using the big-bubble technique was carried out on eye-bank corneas mounted on an artificial anterior chamber. Samples that had a successful big-bubble formation were sent for histological evaluation to determine if any residual stroma remained on the Descemet membrane (DM). Results Big-bubble formation was achieved in 32 donor corneas. Two distinct types of big-bubble were seen: the bubble had either a white margin (30 corneas) or a clear margin (two corneas). The posterior lamellae of all the white margin corneas showed residual stroma on DM with a mean central thickness of 7.0 μm (range 2.6-17.4 μm). The clear margin corneas showed no residual stroma on DM. Conclusion It should no longer be assumed that big-bubble DALK, where the bubble has a white margin, routinely bares DM. True baring of DM may only occur with the less commonly seen clear margin bubble.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When a so-called big bubble is induced during pneumodissection, part of the posterior stroma often adheres to Descemet's membrane, indicating a natural cleavage plane in the stroma about 10 μm above Descemet's membrane.
“when a so-called “big bubble” is induced, part of the posterior stroma often adheres to the Descemet's membrane, and that there is, therefore, a natural cleavage plane in the stroma about 10 μm above Descemet's membrane (Jafarinasab et al., 2010, McKee et al., 2011).”
From Corneal structure and transparency (2015) · cites this paper as McKee et al., 2011
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Corneal structure and transparency
Meek, K. M., & Knupp, C. (2015) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.07.001 · Cited by 853 · see citing works
- Authors
- McKee, H. D., Irion, L. C. D., Carley, F. M., Jhanji, V., & Brahma, A. K.
- Affiliations
- Manchester Royal Eye Hospital (GB)
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Corresponding author
- McKee, H. D.
- Venue
- British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2011-07-23
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1463-1465
- ISSN
- 0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2165175068
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Manchester Biomedical Research Centre
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal surgery and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal Surgery and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Infections and Treatments
- Keywords
- donor cornea, corneal transplantation, corneal histology
- MeSH terms
- Corneal Stroma, Descemet Membrane, Eye Banks, Humans, Organ Culture Techniques, Corneal Transplantation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review