Cited by 44Corneal surgery and disordersCorneal Surgery and TreatmentsOcular Infections and Treatments

Residual corneal stroma in big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: a histological study in eye-bank corneas

McKee, H. D., Irion, L. C. D., Carley, F. M., Jhanji, V., Brahma, A. K.·2011·British Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract

Aim To determine if residual corneal stroma remains on the recipient posterior lamella in big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK). Methods Pneumodissection using the big-bubble technique was carried out on eye-bank corneas mounted on an artificial anterior chamber. Samples that had a successful big-bubble formation were sent for histological evaluation to determine if any residual stroma remained on the Descemet membrane (DM). Results Big-bubble formation was achieved in 32 donor corneas. Two distinct types of big-bubble were seen: the bubble had either a white margin (30 corneas) or a clear margin (two corneas). The posterior lamellae of all the white margin corneas showed residual stroma on DM with a mean central thickness of 7.0 μm (range 2.6-17.4 μm). The clear margin corneas showed no residual stroma on DM. Conclusion It should no longer be assumed that big-bubble DALK, where the bubble has a white margin, routinely bares DM. True baring of DM may only occur with the less commonly seen clear margin bubble.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300360

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When a so-called big bubble is induced during pneumodissection, part of the posterior stroma often adheres to Descemet's membrane, indicating a natural cleavage plane in the stroma about 10 μm above Descemet's membrane.

    “when a so-called “big bubble” is induced, part of the posterior stroma often adheres to the Descemet's membrane, and that there is, therefore, a natural cleavage plane in the stroma about 10 μm above Descemet's membrane (Jafarinasab et al., 2010, McKee et al., 2011).”

    From Corneal structure and transparency (2015) · cites this paper as McKee et al., 2011

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McKee, H. D., Irion, L. C. D., Carley, F. M., Jhanji, V., & Brahma, A. K.
Affiliations
  • Manchester Royal Eye Hospital (GB)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
McKee, H. D.
Venue
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2011-07-23
Volume
95
Issue
10
Pages
1463-1465
ISSN
0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165175068
Cited by
44
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Manchester Biomedical Research Centre
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal Surgery and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Infections and Treatments
Keywords
donor cornea, corneal transplantation, corneal histology
MeSH terms
Corneal Stroma, Descemet Membrane, Eye Banks, Humans, Organ Culture Techniques, Corneal Transplantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review