The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Revisiting the vicious circle of dry eye disease: a focus on the pathophysiology of meibomian gland dysfunction
Open accessAbstract
Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is the most frequent cause of dry eye disease (DED). Eyelid inflammation, microbial growth, associated skin disorders as well as potentially severe corneal complications culminate to make MGD a complex multifactorial disorder. It is probable that MGD is a heterogeneous condition arising from any combination of the following five separate pathophysiological mechanisms: eyelid inflammation, conjunctival inflammation, corneal damage, microbiological changes and DED resulting from tear film instability. The pathogenesis of both MGD and DED can be described in terms of a 'vicious circle': the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of DED and MGD interact, resulting in a double vicious circle. The MGD vicious circle is self-stimulated by microbiological changes, which results in increased melting temperature of meibum and subsequent meibomian gland blockage, reinforcing the vicious circle of MGD. Meibomian gland blockage, dropout and inflammation directly link the two vicious circles. MGD-associated tear film instability provides an entry point into the vicious circle of DED and leads to hyperosmolarity and inflammation, which are both a cause and consequence of DED. Here we propose a new pathophysiological scheme for MGD in order to better identify the pathological mechanisms involved and to allow more efficient targeting of therapeutics. Through better understanding of this scheme, MGD may gain true disease status rather than being viewed as a mere dysfunction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification Report
Craig, J. P., Nichols, K. K., Akpek, E. K., Caffery, B., Dua, H. S., Joo, C.-K., Liu, Z., Nelson, J. D., Nichols, J. J., Tsubota, K., et al. (2017) · The Ocular Surface · doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008 · Cited by 3,383
Reduction in Bacterial Load Using Hypochlorous Acid Hygiene Solution on Ocular Skin
Stroman, D., Mintun, K., Epstein, A., Brimer, C., Patel, C., Branch, J., & Najafi-Tagol, K. (2017) · Clinical Ophthalmology · doi:10.2147/opth.s132851 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Baudouin, C., Messmer, E. M., Aragona, P., Geerling, G., Akova, Y. A., Benítez-del-Castillo, J., Boboridis, K. G., Merayo-Lloves, J., Rolando, M., & Labetoulle, M.
- Venue
- British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2016-01-18
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 300-306
- ISSN
- 0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2079
- OpenAlex
- W2289895447
- Cited by
- 516
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revisiting the vicious circle of dry eye disease: a focus on the pathophysiology of meibomian gland dysfunction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307415
- The paper
- Baudouin, C., Messmer, E. M., Aragona, P., Geerling, G., Akova, Y. A., Benítez-del-Castillo, J., Boboridis, K. G., Merayo-Lloves, J., Rolando, M., & Labetoulle, M. (2016). Revisiting the vicious circle of dry eye disease: a focus on the pathophysiology of meibomian gland dysfunction. British Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307415
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.