The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validation of fan beam dual energy x ray absorptiometry for body composition assessment in adults aged 18–45 years
Abstract
Background: Pencil beam dual energy x ray absorptiometry (DXA) has been shown to provide valid estimates of body fat (%BF), but DXA fan beam technology has not been adequately tested to determine its validity. Objective: To compare %BF estimated from fan beam DXA with %BF determined using two and three compartment (2C, 3C) models. Methods: Men (n = 25) and women (n = 31), aged 18–41 years, participated in the study. Body density, from hydrostatic weighing, was used in the 2C estimate of %BF; DXA was used to determine bone mineral content (BMC) for the 3C estimate of %BF calculated using body density and BMC (3C BMC). DXA was also used to determine %BF. Analysis of variance was used to test for significant differences in %BF between sexes and among methods. Results: Women were significantly shorter, weighed less, had less fat free mass, and a higher %BF than men. No significant differences were found among methods (2C, 3C BMC, DXA) for determination of %BF in either sex. Although not significant, Bland-Altman plots showed that DXA gave higher values for %BF than the 2C and 3C BMC methods. Conclusion: DXA determination of %BF was not different from that of the 2C and 3C BMC models in this group of young adults. However, to validate fan beam DXA fully as a method for body composition assessment in a wide range of individuals and populations, comparisons are needed that use a 4C model with a measure of total body water and BMC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“DXA is considered one of the most accurate methods for body composition assessment due to its demonstrated validity, reliability and precision(10–13).”
From Association between protein intake and lean body mass in a group of Masters Athletes (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- 10.1259/0007-1285-62-739-587 · DOI
- 10.1016/0026-0495(86)90101-0 · DOI
- 1994, FASEB J, 8A, 278
- 1990, Am J Clin Nutr, 51, 1106, 10.1093/ajcn/51.6.1106 · DOI · Paper page
- 1992, Eur J Clin Nutr, 46, 125
- 1992, Eur J Clin Nutr, 46, 39
- Jebb SA, Goldberg GR, Marinos E. DXA measurements of fat and bone mineral density in relation to depth and adiposity. In: Ellis KJ, Eastmen JD, eds. Human body composition. New York: Plenum, 1993:115–19. · DOI
- 1994, Eur J Clin Nutr, 48, 781
- 1995, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 27, 587
- 1995, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 27, 1349
- 1993, Am J Clin Nutr, 58, 589, 10.1093/ajcn/58.5.589 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1152/japplphysiol.00732.2002 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-1-4832-3110-5.50011-X · DOI · Paper page
- 1989, Res Q Exerc Sport, 60, 176, 10.1080/02701367.1989.10607433 · DOI
- 1969, J Appl Physiol, 27, 96, 10.1152/jappl.1969.27.1.96 · DOI · Paper page
- 1986, Exerc Sports Sci Rev, 14, 325
- 2003, Am J Clin Nutr, 77, 356, 10.1093/ajcn/77.2.356 · DOI
- 1998, Am J Clin Nutr, 67, 734, 10.1093/ajcn/67.4.734 · DOI
Cited by
Teigen, L. M., Kuchnia, A. J., Mourtzakis, M., & Earthman, C. P. (2017) · Nutrition in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1177/0884533616676264 · Cited by 75
Momesso, D. P., Bussade, I., Epifanio, M. A., Schettino, C. D. S., Russo, L. A. T., & Kupfer, R. (2011) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2010.09.037 · Cited by 42
Association between protein intake and lean body mass in a group of Masters Athletes
Stanzione, J. R., Boullata, J. I., Bruneau, M. L., & Volpe, S. L. (2022) · Journal of Nutritional Science · doi:10.1017/jns.2022.10 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Norcross, J., & Van Loan, M. D.
- Venue
- British Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2004-07-23
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 472-476
- ISSN
- 0306-3674
- 1473-0480
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of fan beam dual energy x ray absorptiometry for body composition assessment in adults aged 18–45 years. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjsm.2003.005413
- The paper
- Norcross, J., & Van Loan, M. D. (2004). Validation of fan beam dual energy x ray absorptiometry for body composition assessment in adults aged 18–45 years. British Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2003.005413
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.