The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Inspiratory resistive loading improves cycling capacity: a placebo controlled trial
Abstract
Background:Respiratory muscle training has been shown to improve both its strength and endurance. The effect of these improvements on whole-body exercise performance remains controversial. Objective:To assess the effect of a 10 week inspiratory resistive loading (IRL) intervention on respiratory muscle performance and whole-body exercise endurance. Methods:Fifteen apparently healthy subjects (10 men, 5 women) were randomly allocated to one of three groups. One group underwent IRL set at 80% of maximum inspiratory pressure with ever decreasing work/rest ratios until task failure, for three days a week for 10 weeks (IRL group). A second placebo group performed the same training procedure but with a minimal resistance (PLA group). IRL and placebo training were performed at rest. The remaining five control subjects performed no IRL during the 10 week study period (CON group). Cycling endurance capacity at 75% V˙o2 peak was measured before and after the intervention. Results:After the 10 week IRL intervention, respiratory muscle strength (maximum inspiratory pressure) and endurance (sum of sustained maximum inspiratory pressure) had significantly improved (by 34% and 38% respectively). An increase in diaphragm thickness was also observed. These improvements translated into a 36% increase in cycling time to exhaustion at 75% V˙o2 peak. During cycling trials, heart rate, ventilation, and rating of perceived exertion were attenuated in the IRL group. No changes were observed for the PLA or CON group either in the time to exhaustion or cardiorespiratory response to the same intensity of exercise. Conclusion:Ten weeks of IRL attenuated the heart rate, ventilatory, and perceptual response to constant workload exercise, and improved the cycling time to exhaustion. Familiarisation was not a factor and the placebo effect was minimal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Of the fifteen studies testing with a CLT below the 85% threshold, only three specified changes in respiratory sensations, two [79,88] of them reported a significant decrease while one [83] did not.”
From Effect of Respiratory Muscle Training on Exercise Performance in Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2012) · cites this paper as [79]
In the citing paper
“However, in studies using CLTs at intensities below the threshold and including a sham-training group, improvements in the RMT groups exceeded those of the sham-training groups [66,71,79,85,88] with only one exception.[83]”
From Effect of Respiratory Muscle Training on Exercise Performance in Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2012) · cites this paper as [79]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- 1976, J Appl Physiol, 41, 508, 10.1152/jappl.1976.41.4.508 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2165/00007256-200232090-00003 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00868139 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF00717952 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s004210100450 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/026404102760000053 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1055/s-2002-33143 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s004210050511 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s004210100408 · DOI · Paper page
- 2001, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 33, 803
- 1991, Int J Sports Med, 12, 66
- 1991, J Sports Sci, 9, 43, 10.1080/02640419108729854 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/00005768-200007000-00008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s004210050165 · DOI
- 1987, Int J Sports Med, 8, 88, 10.1055/s-2008-1025647 · DOI · Paper page
- 2002, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 34, 1194, 10.1097/00005768-200207000-00022 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0034-5687(01)00250-X · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Eur Respir J Suppl, 16, 5
- 10.1164/rccm.166.4.518 · DOI
- 1995, J Appl Physiol, 79, 539, 10.1152/jappl.1995.79.2.539 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61231-X · DOI · Paper page
- 1994, Int J Sport Psychol, 25, 63
- Caine MP, McConnell AK. Pressure threshold inspiratory muscle training improves submaximal cycling performance. Proceedings of the Third Annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science, Manchester, 1998. No 101.
- 1994, J Appl Physiol, 77, 789, 10.1152/jappl.1994.77.2.789 · DOI
- 2001, Thorax, 55, A51
- 1998, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 30, S41
- 2000, J Appl Physiol, 89, 131, 10.1152/jappl.2000.89.1.131 · DOI · Paper page
- 1998, Adv Exp Med Biol, 450, 231, 10.1007/978-1-4757-9077-1_37 · DOI
- 10.1097/00005768-200011000-00007 · DOI
Cited by
Illi, S. K., Held, U., Frank, I., & Spengler, C. M. (2012) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf03262290 · Cited by 411
HajGhanbari, B., Yamabayashi, C., Buna, T. R., Coelho, J. D., Freedman, K. D., Morton, T. A., Palmer, S. A., Toy, M. A., Walsh, C., Sheel, A. W., et al. (2013) · Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0b013e318269f73f · Cited by 279
Talking Yourself Out of Exhaustion: The Effects of Self-talk on Endurance Performance
BLANCHFIELD, A. W., HARDY, J., DE MORREE, H. M., STAIANO, W., & MARCORA, S. M. (2014) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000000184 · Cited by 195
Metadata
- Authors
- Gething, A. D., Williams, M., & Davies, B.
- Venue
- British Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2004-11-23
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 730-736
- ISSN
- 0306-3674
- 1473-0480
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inspiratory resistive loading improves cycling capacity: a placebo controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjsm.2003.007518
- The paper
- Gething, A. D., Williams, M., & Davies, B. (2004). Inspiratory resistive loading improves cycling capacity: a placebo controlled trial. British Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2003.007518
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.