The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The association football medical research programme: an audit of injuries in professional football
Open accessAbstract
Objectives—To undertake a prospective epidemiological study of the injuries sustained in English professional football over two competitive seasons. Methods—Player injuries were annotated by club medical staff at 91 professional football clubs. A specific injury audit questionnaire was used together with a weekly form that documented each club's current injury status. Results—A total of 6030 injuries were reported over the two seasons with an average of 1.3 injuries per player per season. The mean (SD) number of days absent for each injury was 24.2 (40.2), with 78% of the injuries leading to a minimum of one competitive match being missed. The injury incidence varied throughout the season, with training injuries peaking during July (p<0.05) and match injuries peaking during August (p<0.05). Competition injuries represented 63% of those reported, significantly (p<0.01) more of these injuries occurring towards the end of both halves. Strains (37%) and sprains (19%) were the major injury types, the lower extremity being the site of 87% of the injuries reported. Most injury mechanisms were classified as being non-contact (58%). Re-injuries accounted for 7% of all injuries, 66% of these being classified as either a strain or a sprain. The severity of re-injuries was greater than the initial injury (p<0.01). Conclusions—Professional football players are exposed to a high risk of injury and there is a need to investigate ways of reducing this risk. Areas that warrant attention include the training programmes implemented by clubs during various stages of the season, the factors contributing to the pattern of injuries during matches with respect to time, and the rehabilitation protocols employed by clubs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Injury incidence and injury patterns in professional football: the UEFA injury study
Ekstrand, J., Hägglund, M., & Waldén, M. (2011) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsm.2009.060582 · Cited by 1,436
Hägglund, M., Waldén, M., Bahr, R., & Ekstrand, J. (2005) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsm.2005.018267 · Cited by 604
Injury risk associated with playing actions during competitive soccer
Rahnama, N., Reilly, T., & Lees, A. (2002) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsm.36.5.354 · Cited by 272
Greig, M. (2008) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546508314413 · Cited by 187
Greig, M., Marchant, D., Lovell, R., Clough, P., & McNaughton, L. (2007) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsm.2006.030387 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Hawkins, R. D., Hulse, M. A., Wilkinson, C., Hodson, A., & Gibson, M.
- Venue
- British Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-47
- ISSN
- 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-0480
- OpenAlex
- W2126065895
- Cited by
- 764
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.