The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A retrospective case-control analysis of 2002 running injuries
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To provide an extensive and up to date database for specific running related injuries, across the sexes, as seen at a primary care sports medicine facility, and to assess the relative risk for individual injuries based on investigation of selected risk factors. Methods: Patient data were recorded by doctors at the Allan McGavin Sports Medicine Centre over a two year period. They included assessment of anthropometric, training, and biomechanical information. A model was constructed (with odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals) of possible contributing factors using a dependent variable of runners with a specific injury and comparing them with a control group of runners who experienced a different injury. Variables included in the model were: height, weight, body mass index, age, activity history, weekly activity, history of injury, and calibre of runner. Results: Most of the study group were women (54%). Some injuries occurred with a significantly higher frequency in one sex. Being less than 34 years old was reported as a risk factor across the sexes for patellofemoral pain syndrome, and in men for iliotibial band friction syndrome, patellar tendinopathy, and tibial stress syndrome. Being active for less than 8.5 years was positively associated with injury in both sexes for tibial stress syndrome; and women with a body mass index less than 21 kg/m 2 were at a significantly higher risk for tibial stress fractures and spinal injuries. Patellofemoral pain syndrome was the most common injury, followed by iliotibial band friction syndrome, plantar fasciitis, meniscal injuries of the knee, and tibial stress syndrome. Conclusions: Although various risk factors were shown to be positively associated with a risk for, or protection from, specific injuries, future research should include a non-injured control group and a more precise measure of weekly running distance and running experience to validate these results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gait retraining to reduce lower extremity loading in runners
Crowell, H. P., & Davis, I. S. (2011) · Clinical Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.09.003 · Cited by 403
Willson, J. D., & Davis, I. S. (2008) · Clinical Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.08.025 · Cited by 386
Utility of the Frontal Plane Projection Angle in Females With Patellofemoral Pain
Willson, J. D., & Davis, I. S. (2008) · Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2008.2706 · Cited by 251
Factors Related to Successful Completion of a 161-km Ultramarathon
Hoffman, M. D., & Fogard, K. (2011) · International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance · doi:10.1123/ijspp.6.1.25 · Cited by 208
An evaluation of the rearfoot posture in individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome.
(2004) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 174
Metadata
- Authors
- Taunton, J. E., Ryan, M. B., Clement, D. B., McKenzie, D. C., Lloyd-Smith, D. R., & Zumbo, B. D.
- Venue
- British Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 95-101
- ISSN
- 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-0480
- OpenAlex
- W2128589897
- Cited by
- 1,661
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A retrospective case-control analysis of 2002 running injuries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjsm.36.2.95
- The paper
- Taunton, J. E., Ryan, M. B., Clement, D. B., McKenzie, D. C., Lloyd-Smith, D. R., & Zumbo, B. D. (2002). A retrospective case-control analysis of 2002 running injuries. British Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.36.2.95
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.