Cited by 251Lower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesKnee injuries and reconstruction techniquesHip disorders and treatments

Utility of the Frontal Plane Projection Angle in Females With Patellofemoral Pain

Willson, John D., Davis, Irene S.·2008·Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study of females with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) and a control group. OBJECTIVES: Three different approaches were used to examine the utility of a 2-dimensional (2-D) frontal plane projection angle (FPPA) measure of knee alignment. First, we measured the FPPA association with respect to 3-dimensional (3-D) lower extremity joint rotations during single-leg squats. Second, we determined the correlation of the FPPA during single-leg squats with hip and knee joint rotations during running and single leg jumping. Third, we compared the FPPA between females with and without PFPS. BACKGROUND: PFPS is associated with altered lower extremity kinematics during weight-bearing activities that decrease retropatellar contact area and increase retropatellar stress. An objective and simple procedure to quantify altered kinematics during weight-bearing activities may help clinicians identify individuals who may likely benefit from interventions to improve lower extremity kinematics. METHODS AND MEASURES: Twenty females with PFPS and 20 healthy female controls performed single-leg squats, running, and repetitive single-leg jumps while 3-D lower extremity kinematics were recorded. The FPPA was recorded by a digital camera during single-leg stance and single-leg squats. Correlation coefficients were used to quantify the association between the FPPA and transverse and frontal plane hip and knee angles for all activities. Independent t tests were used to compare FPPA values between groups. RESULTS: FPPA values representing medial displacement of the knee during single-leg squats were associated with increased hip adduction (r = 0.32 to 0.38, P<.044) and knee external rotation (r = 0.48 to 0.55, P<.001) across activities. FPPA values for the PFPS group reveal greater medial displacement of the knee compared with those of the control group during single-leg squats (P = .012). CONCLUSION: The association between the FPPA and lower extremity kinematics that are associated with PFPS suggest that the FPPA during single-leg squats may be a useful clinical measure. However, these methods should not be used to quantify 3-D joint rotations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2519/jospt.2008.2706

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Biomechanical investigations of the SLS have focused on narrow demographic cohorts or included people with known musculoskeletal conditions such as patellofemoral pain syndrome or anterior cruciate ligament injury.

    “Biomechanical investigations of the SLS have focused on narrow demographic cohorts 1,3,9 or have included people with known musculoskeletal conditions such as patellofemoral pain syndrome or anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. 2,6,10”
  • In clinical practice, the quality of SLS performance is often rated visually on a 10-point ordinal scale, with poor scores (typically <5) indicating a propensity for common degenerative and traumatic musculoskeletal injuries.

    “In clinical practice, the quality of SLS performance is often rated visually on a 10-point ordinal scale, with poor scores (typically < 5) indicating a propensity for common degenerative and traumatic musculoskeletal injuries. 4-6”
  • Similarly undesirable lower-limb kinematics have been observed in clinical patient populations, including those with patellofemoral pain syndrome and those with a history of ACL injury.

    “Interestingly, similarly undesirable LL kinematics have been observed in clinical patient populations, including those with patello-femoral pain syndrome 6,10,22 and those with a history of ACL injury. 2”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Willson, J. D., & Davis, I. S.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–La Crosse (US)
Venue
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
Published
2008-10
Volume
38
Issue
10
Pages
606-615
ISSN
  • 0190-6011 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-1344
OpenAlex
W2055763710
Cited by
251
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 20
FWCI
4.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip disorders and treatments
Keywords
patellofemoral pain, frontal plane projection angle, knee alignment, lower limb kinematics, single-leg squat, hip adduction, knee external rotation, female athletes
MeSH terms
Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Exercise Test, Female, Hip Joint, Humans, Knee Joint, Posture, Rotation, Case-Control Studies, Lower Extremity, Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review