Cited by 87Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsHealth Sciences Research and Educationscientometrics and bibliometrics research

15 years of tracking physiotherapy evidence on PEDro, where are we now?

Open access
Kamper, Steven J, Moseley, Anne M, Herbert, Robert D, Maher, Christopher G, Elkins, Mark R, Sherrington, Catherine·2015·British Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Healthcare systems across the globe have begun the transition to evidence-based practice. The degree to which the transition has occurred can be debated but, it is underpinned by a large and rapidly growing volume of research. However, this research is only useful if it is reliable, comprehensive and accessible. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro; http://www.pedro.org.au) recently celebrated 15 years of existence. PEDro is a free resource that indexes published randomised controlled trials (RCT), systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines relevant to physiotherapy. The first physiotherapy RCT was published in 1929 and the first physiotherapy systematic review in 1982. Since then there has been exponential growth in the number of published RCTs and systematic reviews relevant to physiotherapy (figure 1). This editorial reflects on what PEDro tells us about the evidence base for physiotherapy and sports physiotherapy in particular. Figure 1 Growth in the number of published randomised controlled trials (RCTs), reviews and guidelines indexed on PEDro. As of October 2014, PEDro indexes 23 049 RCTs, 5039 systematic reviews and 512 clinical practice guidelines. The largest number of studies are in the musculoskeletal subdiscipline (7676), followed by cardiothoracics (5334) and gerontology (4105). This volume of studies and the ongoing increase in rate of publication points to a substantial commitment to physiotherapy research. There are 1325 sports physiotherapy studies (1098 RCTs, 222 systematic reviews and 5 practice guidelines); this is the second lowest of the 10 subdisciplines. The low number of studies is surprising given the high profile of sports physiotherapy. The rate of publications …

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094468

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kamper, S. J., Moseley, A. M., Herbert, R. D., Maher, C. G., Elkins, M. R., & Sherrington, C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Kamper, Steven J
Venue
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2015-04-01
Volume
49
Issue
14
Pages
907-909
ISSN
  • 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0480
OpenAlex
W2161992044
Cited by
87
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4
FWCI
7.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Keywords
Pedro, physiotherapy research, sports physiotherapy, evidence-based practice, randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, research output growth, musculoskeletal research, gerontological research
MeSH terms
Forecasting, Humans, Professional Practice, Review Literature as Topic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Databases, Bibliographic, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine, Physical Therapy Modalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review