Cited by 76Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and HealthSports Performance and Training

High-intensity interval training: key data needed to bridge the gap from laboratory to public health policy

Gray, Stuart R, Ferguson, Carrie, Birch, Karen, Forrest, Laura J, Gill, Jason M R·2016·British Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

The World Health Organization and a number of national bodies recommend adults undertake at least 150 min/week of moderate intensity physical activity, or 75 min/week of vigorous intensity physical activity. However, a large proportion of the population do not achieve these targets. Lack of time is often cited as a primary barrier,1 and many researchers have suggested that high-intensity interval training (HIIT), with interval durations from 10 s to 4 min and intensities ranging from 85% maximal heart rate (HRmax) to ‘all out’ efforts, may provide a time-efficient solution to improve public health.2 A wealth of evidence has demonstrated that HIIT can elicit a range of health benefits such as improved cardiorespiratory fitness, insulin sensitivity and vascular function, with these benefits being of at least a similar magnitude to those seen with standard moderate intensity physical activity interventions.3 ,4 These data are clear and convincing. However, they largely emanate from …

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095705

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although high intensity training has now been incorporated in most public health recommendations, the long term effect, feasibility, and safety have recently been questioned.

    “Although high intensity training, which HIIT represents, has now been incorporated in most public health recommendations, the long term effect, feasibility, and safety have recently been questioned.26 42 43”

    From Effect of exercise training for five years on all cause mortality in older adults—the Generation 100 study: randomised controlled trial (2020) · cites this paper as [42]

    The paper questions HIIT’s long-term evidence, real-world feasibility, and safety (Four key studies needed, pp. 3–5). It says the WHO and a number of national bodies recommend vigorous-intensity activity (p. 2), but does not establish that *most* recommendations incorporate high-intensity training. It also says more evidence is needed to determine whether HIIT merits a place in public-health recommendations (p. 5). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gray, S. R., Ferguson, C., Birch, K., Forrest, L. J., & Gill, J. M. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • University of the West of Scotland (GB)
Corresponding author
Gray, Stuart R
Venue
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2016-03-18
Volume
50
Issue
20
Pages
1231-1232
ISSN
  • 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0480
OpenAlex
W2290714395
Cited by
76
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
high-intensity interval training, public health policy, evidence translation, physical activity guidelines, exercise prescription
MeSH terms
High-Intensity Interval Training, Health Policy, Health Promotion, Humans, Physical Fitness, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review