Cited by 36Physical Activity and HealthRecreational Sport and Physical ActivityContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How are we measuring physical activity and sedentary behaviour in the four home nations of the UK? A narrative review of current surveillance measures and future directions

Open access
Strain, Tessa, Milton, Karen, Dall, Philippa, Standage, Martyn, Mutrie, Nanette·2020·British Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Background/objectives: To explore and describe the comparability between the surveys of the UK home nations (England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales) that monitor compliance with the Chief Medical Officers’ physical activity (PA) recommendations. We also suggest ways to improve the UK national PA and sedentary behaviour (SB) surveillance systems. Methods: We identified national surveys that monitor PA and SB through searching UK-wide and devolved administration websites, the Global Observatory for Physical Activity Country Cards and the Active Healthy Kids Report Cards. Subsequently, we extracted information from survey documentation on the survey commissioners and contractors, method of administration, current questionnaire details relevant to the PA recommendations, questionnaire changes over the previous decade and the most recent prevalence figures. Results: For adults and older adults, five surveys assess the moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) recommendation, three assess muscle strengthening and three assess SB. For older adults only, three assess balance and co-ordination. For children, seven assess MVPA, none assess muscle strengthening and five assess SB. Only one survey reports on the under 5 PA recommendation. There is no part of the recommendations for which comparable estimates can be calculated across all four home nations. The greatest variation is among the SB questions and reporting. No survey has regularly used device-based measures. Conclusion: UK surveillance of the PA recommendations is complex, undertaken separately in the home nations, using multiple surveys that cover adults and children separately. We recommend that the costs and benefits of harmonising the existing questionnaires are considered, along with the potential introduction of device-based measures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjsports-2018-100355

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Promotion of muscle strengthening and falls prevention activities have been largely forgotten or ignored in the past, and in most countries a much greater focus on this is now required for policy and practice.

    “Promotion of muscle strengthening and falls prevention activities have been largely forgotten or ignored in the past27 28 and in most countries a much greater focus on this is now required for policy and practice.”

    From World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour (2020) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Introduction says muscle-strengthening and balance activities gained greater prominence in the 2011 UK recommendations than in earlier policy documents. The Discussion adds that trend data have not been widely integrated into policy-making and that few countries survey these activities. This supports past underattention, but the paper examines recommendations and surveillance rather than establishing that promotion was largely forgotten or ignored. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Milton K , Bauman A . A critical analysis of the cycles of physical activity policy in England. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2015;12.doi:10.1186/s12966-015-0169-5 · DOI
  2. The Sedentary Behaviour and Obesity Expert Working Group . Sedentary behaviour and obesity: review of the current scientific evidence. London, UK: Department of Health, 2010.
  3. Hallal, 2012, Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects, The Lancet, 380, 247, 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60646-1 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Guthold, 2018, Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants, Lancet Glob Health, 6, e1077, 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30357-7 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Ramirez Varela A , Salvo D , Pratt M , et al . Worldwide use of the first set of physical activity Country Cards: The Global Observatory for Physical Activity - GoPA! Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2018;15.doi:10.1186/s12966-018-0663-7 · DOI
  6. University of Bristol . UK physical activity guidelines review, 2018
  7. Harrington, 2016, Results from Ireland North and South's 2016 Report Card on Physical Activity for Children and Youth, J Phys Act Health, 13, S183, 10.1123/jpah.2016-0334 · DOI
  8. Reilly, 2016, Results from Scotland's 2016 report card on physical activity for children and youth, J Phys Act Health, 13, S251, 10.1123/jpah.2016-0325 · DOI
  9. Tyler, 2016, Results from Wales' 2016 report card on physical activity for children and youth: is Wales turning the tide on children's inactivity?, J Phys Act Health, 13, S330, 10.1123/jpah.2016-0309 · DOI
  10. Wilkie, 2016, Results from England's 2016 report card on physical activity for children and youth, J Phys Act Health, 13, S143, 10.1123/jpah.2016-0298 · DOI
  11. 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013844 · DOI
  12. Strain T , Fitzsimons C , Kelly P , et al . The forgotten guidelines: cross-sectional analysis of participation in muscle strengthening and balance & co-ordination activities by adults and older adults in Scotland. BMC Public Health 2016;16.doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3774-6 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Scholes S , Mindell J . Health survey for England 2012 chapter 2: physical activity in adults. Leeds, UK: Health and Social Care Information Centre, 2013.
  14. Hovald P . Scottish health survey 2015 chapter 7: physical activity. Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Government, 2016.
  15. 10.1093/aje/kwu087 · DOI
  16. Helmerhorst HJF , Brage S , Warren J , et al . A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2012;9.doi:10.1186/1479-5868-9-103 · DOI
  17. Scholes, 2016, Comparison of the physical activity and sedentary behaviour and the short-form international physical activity questionnaire: an analysis of health survey for England data, Plos One, 11, e0151647, 10.1371/journal.pone.0151647 · DOI
  18. 10.1136/adc.2007.135905 · DOI
  19. Chastin SFM , Dontje ML , Skelton DA , et al . Systematic comparative validation of self-report measures of sedentary time against an objective measure of postural sitting (activPAL). Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2018;15.doi:10.1186/s12966-018-0652-x · DOI
  20. Williamson C , Kelly P , Strain T . Different analysis methods of Scottish and English child physical activity data explain the majority of the difference between the national prevalence estimates. BMC Public Health 2019;19.doi:10.1186/s12889-019-6517-7 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.12.013 · DOI
  22. Roberts, 2016, Use of new guidance to profile 'equivalent minutes' of aerobic physical activity for adults in England reveals gender, geographical, and socio-economic inequalities in meeting public health guidance: cross-sectional study, Prev Med Rep, 4, 50, 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.05.009 · DOI
  23. 10.1080/00140139.2011.570458 · DOI
  24. Strain, 2018, Differences by age and sex in the sedentary time of adults in Scotland, J Sports Sci, 36, 732, 10.1080/02640414.2017.1339904 · DOI
  25. 10.1123/jpah.6.6.790 · DOI
  26. 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093546 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Dall, 2018, Characteristics of a protocol to collect objective physical behavior data in a large study: seniors USP (understanding sedentary patterns), J Meas Phys Behav, 1, 26, 10.1123/jmpb.2017-0004 · DOI
  28. McCrorie P , Mitchell R , Ellaway A . Comparison of two methods to assess physical activity prevalence in children: an observational study using a nationally representative sample of Scottish children aged 10–11 years. BMJ Open 2018;8.doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018369 · DOI
  29. Griffiths LJ , Cortina-Borja M , Sera F , et al . How active are our children? Findings from the millennium cohort study. BMJ Open 2013;3.doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002893 · DOI
  30. Steene-Johannessen, 2016, Are self-report measures able to define individuals as physically active or inactive?, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 48, 235, 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000760 · DOI
  31. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31820ce174 · DOI
  32. 10.3945/ajcn.117.156851 · DOI
  33. Strain T , Wijndaele K , Brage S . Physical activity surveillance through smartphone apps and wearable trackers: examining the UK potential for nationally representative sampling. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. In Press 2019;7.doi:10.2196/11898 · DOI
  34. Dean L . Scottish health survey 2017 chapter 7: physical activity. Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Government, 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Strain, T., Milton, K., Dall, P., Standage, M., & Mutrie, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • Glasgow Caledonian University (GB)
  • University of Bath (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Strain, Tessa
Venue
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2019-05-22
Volume
54
Issue
21
Pages
1269-1276
ISSN
  • 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0480
OpenAlex
W2944649530
Cited by
36
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline (Glasgow Caledonian University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ResearchOnline (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12015/3 (Tessa Strain only))
  • Chief Medical Officers' Physical Activity Guideline Review
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Recreational Sport and Physical Activity
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
physical activity surveillance, sedentary behavior, physical activity guidelines, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, muscle strengthening, balance and coordination, children's physical activity, older adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Population Surveillance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Exercise, Muscle Strength, Young Adult, Sedentary Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review