Cited by 968Physical Activity and HealthContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsHuman Mobility and Location-Based Analysis

Evolution of accelerometer methods for physical activity research

Open access
Troiano, Richard P, McClain, James J, Brychta, Robert J, Chen, Kong Y·2014·British Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

The technology and application of current accelerometer-based devices in physical activity (PA) research allow the capture and storage or transmission of large volumes of raw acceleration signal data. These rich data not only provide opportunities to improve PA characterisation, but also bring logistical and analytic challenges. We discuss how researchers and developers from multiple disciplines are responding to the analytic challenges and how advances in data storage, transmission and big data computing will minimise logistical challenges. These new approaches also bring the need for several paradigm shifts for PA researchers, including a shift from count-based approaches and regression calibrations for PA energy expenditure (PAEE) estimation to activity characterisation and EE estimation based on features extracted from raw acceleration signals. Furthermore, a collaborative approach towards analytic methods is proposed to facilitate PA research, which requires a shift away from multiple independent calibration studies. Finally, we make the case for a distinction between PA represented by accelerometer-based devices and PA assessed by self-report.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093546

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Troiano, R. P., McClain, J. J., Brychta, R. J., & Chen, K. Y.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Troiano, Richard P
Venue
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2014-04-29
Volume
48
Issue
13
Pages
1019-1023
ISSN
  • 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0480
OpenAlex
W2108707936
Cited by
968
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 108 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 7
FWCI
7.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (Z99 CA999999)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Keywords
accelerometer, physical activity measurement, physical activity energy expenditure, signal feature extraction, calibration, big data processing, data storage and transmission, research methodology evolution
MeSH terms
Diffusion of Innovation, Humans, Nutrition Surveys, Exercise, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Consensus, Self Report, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review