Cited by 54Pharmaceutical industry and healthcareGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyPolitical Influence and Corporate Strategies

Mapping conflict of interests: scoping review

Open access
Chimonas, Susan, Mamoor, Maha, Zimbalist, Sophia A, Barrow, Brooke, Bach, Peter B, Korenstein, Deborah·2021·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify all known ties between the medical product industry and the healthcare ecosystem. DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: From initial literature searches and expert input, a map was created to show the network of medical product industry ties across parties and activities in the healthcare ecosystem. Through a scoping review, the ties were then verified, cataloged, and characterized, with data abstracted on types of industry ties (financial, non-financial), applicable policies for conflict of interests, and publicly available data sources. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence and types of medical product industry ties to activities and parties, presence of policies for conflict of interests, and publicly available data. RESULTS: A map derived through synthesis of 538 articles from 37 countries shows an extensive network of medical product industry ties to activities and parties in the healthcare ecosystem. Key activities include research, healthcare education, guideline development, formulary selection, and clinical care. Parties include non-profit entities, the healthcare profession, the market supply chain, and government. The medical product industry has direct ties to all parties and some activities through multiple pathways; direct ties extend through interrelationships among parties and activities. The most frequently identified parties were within the healthcare profession, with individual professionals described in 422 (78%) of the included studies. More than half (303, 56%) of the publications documented medical product industry ties to research, with clinical care (156, 29%), health professional education (145, 27%), guideline development (33, 6%), and formulary selection (8, 1%) appearing less often. Policies for conflict of interests exist for some financial and a few non-financial ties; publicly available data sources seldom describe or quantify these ties. CONCLUSIONS: An extensive network of medical product industry ties to activities and parties exists in the healthcare ecosystem. Policies for conflict of interests and publicly available data are lacking, suggesting that enhanced oversight and transparency are needed to protect patient care from commercial influence and to ensure public trust.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj-2021-066576

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Each individual player may have multiple financial and non-financial interactions with multiple entities, often in ways consistent with the primary interests of benefiting people with lived experience and society.

    “In this ecosystem, not only clinicians and researchers, but each individual player may have multiple financial and nonfinancial interactions with multiple entities 269 , often in ways that are consistent with the primary interests of benefitting PWLE and society.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [6]Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Open Payments 2014. www.cms.gov/openpayments/ (accessed January 19 2016). 26547386
  2. [33]Mitchell AP Basch EM Dusetzina SB. Financial Relationships With Industry Among National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guideline Authors. JAMA Oncol 2016; 2: 1628- 31. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.2710. 27561170 · DOI
  3. [71]Stack SJ. AMA Statement on Sunshine Act Data Release, 2015. www.ama-assn.org/press-center/press-releases/ama-statement-sunshine-act-data-release
  4. [74]Chapter 8. Drug Marketing Practices. California Health and Safety Code, 2002.
  5. [75]An Act to Prohibit Certain Gifts to Health Care Practitioners, 2017. Public Law No: Title 32 Chapter 267.13759. www.mainelegislature.org/legis/bills/bills_124th/billpdfs/HP088101.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chimonas, S., Mamoor, M., Zimbalist, S. A., Barrow, B., Bach, P. B., & Korenstein, D.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Chimonas, Susan
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2021-11-03
Volume
375
Pages
e066576
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3209153473
Cited by
54
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Arnold Ventures
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Keywords
conflicts of interest, pharmaceutical industry, healthcare ecosystem, industry ties, financial conflicts of interest, non-financial conflicts of interest, conflict of interest policies, transparency, research funding, health professions education, guideline development, formulary selection, clinical care, public trust
MeSH terms
Drug Industry, Health Policy, Humans, Maps as Topic, Global Health, Conflict of Interest, Health Care Sector

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review