Cited by 318Frailty in Older AdultsNutrition and Health in AgingBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multicomponent intervention to prevent mobility disability in frail older adults: randomised controlled trial (SPRINTT project)

Open access

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether a multicomponent intervention based on physical activity with technological support and nutritional counselling prevents mobility disability in older adults with physical frailty and sarcopenia. Design: Evaluator blinded, randomised controlled trial. Setting: 16 clinical sites across 11 European countries, January 2016 to 31 October 2019. Participants: 1519 community dwelling men and women aged 70 years or older with physical frailty and sarcopenia, operationalised as the co-occurrence of low functional status, defined as a short physical performance battery (SPPB) score of 3 to 9, low appendicular lean mass, and ability to independently walk 400 m. 760 participants were randomised to a multicomponent intervention and 759 received education on healthy ageing (controls). Interventions: The multicomponent intervention comprised moderate intensity physical activity twice weekly at a centre and up to four times weekly at home. Actimetry data were used to tailor the intervention. Participants also received personalised nutritional counselling. Control participants received education on healthy ageing once a month. Interventions and follow-up lasted for up to 36 months. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was mobility disability (inability to independently walk 400 m in <15 minutes). Persistent mobility disability (inability to walk 400 m on two consecutive occasions) and changes from baseline to 24 and 36 months in physical performance, muscle strength, and appendicular lean mass were analysed as pre-planned secondary outcomes. Primary comparisons were conducted in participants with baseline SPPB scores of 3-7 (n=1205). Those with SPPB scores of 8 or 9 (n=314) were analysed separately for exploratory purposes. Results: Mean age of the 1519 participants (1088 women) was 78.9 (standard deviation 5.8) years. The average follow-up was 26.4 (SD 9.5) months. Among participants with SPPB scores of 3-7, mobility disability occurred in 283/605 (46.8%) assigned to the multicomponent intervention and 316/600 (52.7%) controls (hazard ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 0.92; P=0.005). Persistent mobility disability occurred in 127/605 (21.0%) participants assigned to the multicomponent intervention and 150/600 (25.0%) controls (0.79, 0.62 to 1.01; P=0.06). The between group difference in SPPB score was 0.8 points (95% confidence interval 0.5 to 1.1 points; P<0.001) and 1.0 point (95% confidence interval 0.5 to 1.6 points; P<0.001) in favour of the multicomponent intervention at 24 and 36 months, respectively. The decline in handgrip strength at 24 months was smaller in women assigned to the multicomponent intervention than to control (0.9 kg, 95% confidence interval 0.1 to 1.6 kg; P=0.028). Women in the multicomponent intervention arm lost 0.24 kg and 0.49 kg less appendicular lean mass than controls at 24 months (95% confidence interval 0.10 to 0.39 kg; P<0.001) and 36 months (0.26 to 0.73 kg; P<0.001), respectively. Serious adverse events occurred in 237/605 (39.2%) participants assigned to the multicomponent intervention and 216/600 (36.0%) controls (risk ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 0.94 to 1.26). In participants with SPPB scores of 8 or 9, mobility disability occurred in 46/155 (29.7%) in the multicomponent intervention and 38/159 (23.9%) controls (hazard ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 1.95; P=0.34). Conclusions: A multicomponent intervention was associated with a reduction in the incidence of mobility disability in older adults with physical frailty and sarcopenia and SPPB scores of 3-7. Physical frailty and sarcopenia may be targeted to preserve mobility in vulnerable older people. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02582138 .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj-2021-068788

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig 1 Flow of participants through study. *Sum of individual items is higher than number of ineligible participants because screening was not always stopped at the first unmet eligibility criterion. Some entries are different from those previously published8 because of data updates after database cleaning. DEXA=dual energy x ray absorptiometry; SPPB=short physical performance battery; SPRINTT=Sarcopenia and Physical fRailty IN older people: multi-componenT Treatment strategies
Fig 1 Flow of participants through study. *Sum of individual items is higher than number of ineligible participants because screening was not always stopped at the first unmet eligibility criterion. Some entries are different from those previously published8 because of data updates after database cleaning. DEXA=dual energy x ray absorptiometry; SPPB=short physical performance battery; SPRINTT=Sarcopenia and Physical fRailty IN older people: multi-componenT Treatment strategiesCC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig 2 Kaplan-Meier curves for incident mobility disability in participants with baseline short physical performance battery (SPPB) score of 3-7. The graph is truncated at 36 months, after which two additional mobility disability events were recorded in the multicomponent intervention group and three in the lifestyle education group. CI=confidence interval
Fig 2 Kaplan-Meier curves for incident mobility disability in participants with baseline short physical performance battery (SPPB) score of 3-7. The graph is truncated at 36 months, after which two additional mobility disability events were recorded in the multicomponent intervention group and three in the lifestyle education group. CI=confidence intervalCC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig 3 Prespecified subgroup analyses in participants with baseline short physical performance battery (SPPB) score of 3-7. CVD=cardiovascular disease; CI=confidence interval
Fig 3 Prespecified subgroup analyses in participants with baseline short physical performance battery (SPPB) score of 3-7. CVD=cardiovascular disease; CI=confidence intervalCC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 318

Metadata

Authors
Bernabei, R., Landi, F., Calvani, R., Cesari, M., Del Signore, S., Anker, S. D., Bejuit, R., Bordes, P., Cherubini, A., Cruz-Jentoft, A. J., Di Bari, M., Friede, T., Gorostiaga Ayestarán, C., Goyeau, H., Jónsson, P. V., Kashiwa, M., Lattanzio, F., Maggio, M., Mariotti, L., Miller, R. R., Rodriguez-Mañas, L., Roller-Wirnsberger, R., Rýznarová, I., Scholpp, J., Schols, A. M. W. J., Sieber, C. C., Sinclair, A. J., Skalska, A., Strandberg, T., Tchalla, A., Topinková, E., Tosato, M., Vellas, B., von Haehling, S., Pahor, M., Roubenoff, R., & Marzetti, E.
Affiliations
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
  • Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT)
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Bluecompanion, London, UK
  • German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DE)
  • Sanofi-Aventis R&D, Chilly-Mazarin, France
  • Sanofi (France) (FR)
  • Istituto Nazionale di Riposo e Cura per Anziani (IT)
  • Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (ES)
  • Geriatric Intensive Care Medicine, Università degli Studi di Firenze and Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
  • Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
  • International Clinical Trial Research Department, Servier, Madrid, Spain
  • University of Iceland (IS)
  • Astellas Pharma (Japan) (JP)
  • University of Parma (IT)
  • Translational Medicine, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA
  • Servicio de Geriatría, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Spain
  • Department of Internal Medicine, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
  • Silesian Hospital in Opava, Opava, Czech Republic
  • Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) (DE)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
  • Diabetes Frail, Droitwich Spa, UK
  • Jagiellonian University (PL)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges (FR)
  • Charles University (CZ)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (FR)
  • German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) partner site Göttingen, Goettingen, Germany
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
Corresponding author
Marzetti, Emanuele
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2022-05-11
Volume
377
Pages
e068788
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4280521333
Cited by
318
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 25
FWCI
37.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Opin vísindi (Opin vísindi) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubliCatt (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Homo Politicus (Academy of Humanities and Economics in Lodz) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • Università Politecnica delle Marche (Università Politecnica delle Marche) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Opin vísindi (Opin vísindi) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Innovative Medicines Initiative
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
mobility impairment, frailty, sarcopenia, older adults, multicomponent intervention, physical activity, nutrition counseling, actigraphy, home-based exercise, physical performance, muscle strength, appendicular lean mass, community-dwelling older adults, walking ability
MeSH terms
Frailty, Aged, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Frail Elderly, Hand Strength, Sarcopenia, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review